Co Developer - Judgment Search Results

P. Kalaivani and 2 Others Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Comm ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2000(2)CTC292

..... in the case of municipal corporation of greater bombay v industrial development investment co air1997sc482 has observed as follows it is well settled law ..... the act in go ms no 107 9 housing and urban development dated 13 7 78 published in the government gazette on 14 ..... court has considered the effect of such a question in delhi development authority v sudan singh 45 1991 dlt 502 but unfortunately in .....

U. Prashanthi, Rep by Her Power of Attorney Agent, Mr. U. Karunasesh, ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2000(1)CTC714

is supported by the three judges bench of the apex court in satendra prasad jain case air1993sc2517 wherein the apex court made in g o ms no 1525 housing and urban development dated 28 9 1986 as the major portion of the

V. Arunshanker, Represented by Father and Power Agent, Mr. S. Venkatra ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)1MLJ215

violation of act of 1999 under article 213 of the constitution if the legislative assembly of a state is not in

Development Credit Bank Ltd. Vs. Mr. Azim A. Charania

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2001(2)ALLMR352; 2000(4)BomCR547

..... 2 45 of 1998 2 the petitioner earlier operated as development co operative bank limited but has been converted into a joint stock ..... dispute exists between the employers in relation to the management of development credit bank ltd mumbai and their workmen in respect of ..... period of 6 months the schedule whether the action of bank development credit bank ltd mumbai terminating the services of workman shri .....

General Secretary, All India Tourism Development Corporation Employees ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)ILLJ834Mad

six units at all india level all the labour force could only be treated as the workmen of the one and and operated by the management i e the indian tourism development corporation 16 in many a judgment analysing the true meaning

indore Development Authority, Indore Vs. Indore Development Authority ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [2000(87)FLR57]; 2001(1)MPHT367

no dispute with regard to the ratio of the apex court but the aforesaid judgment would show that the petition filed was to be implemented through the agency of petitioner indore development authority for short ida which was to be financed by

Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Employees Union Vs. Gujarat Mi ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: [2001(88)FLR450]; (2002)1GLR26

..... civil application no 1404 of 1987 is preferred by gujarat mineral development corporation employees union hereinafter referred to as the trade union against ..... supra the apex court also considered the case of bombay gas co ltd v gopal bhiva reported in air 1964 sc 752 wherein ..... also considered the case of chief mining engineer east india coal co ltd v rameswar reported in air 1968 sc 218 the court .....

Parsvnath Developers Ltd. and anr. Vs. New Okhla Industrial Developmen ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: (2000)3UPLBEC2336

..... proceeds to consider the petition on merits 11 new okhla industrial development authority the respondent no 1 hereinafter called noida issued an advertisement ..... no 976 of 1996 shri virat bhushan v new okhla industrial development authority through its chairman and anr decided on 21st august ..... ors reported in air 1982 sc 1234 and agra cantt vendors co operative society ltd agra v the union of india and .....

institute of Trade and Industrial Development Vs. Delhi Development Au ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000VIIAD(Delhi)106; AIR2001Delhi21; 87(2000)DLT700; 2000(56)DRJ615

of comity of nations and comity of judgments of the courts of two different countries in deciding the matter directed the decision in shri r r mehta educational trust vs delhi development authority anr 81 1999 dlt925 he submitted that in terms

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. Kumardhubi Metal Casting Engg. Ltd. a ...

Court: Patna

proceedings would be at the principal seat of the high court 6 only these aspects are to be considered today these