Section 521 - Judgment Search Results

Hamilton Vs. Lanning

Court: US Supreme Court

..... debtor does not file the schedule of current income required by section 521 a 1 b ii makes little sense unless a court can ..... refers to projected disposable income of the debtor as defined in section 1325 b 2 this cross reference petitioner argues shows that ..... special circumstances within the meaning of 707 b 2 b i section 707 identifies as examples of special circumstances a serious medical condition .....

Mcdonald Vs. Chicago

Court: US Supreme Court

..... fourteenth amendment as an antidiscrimination rule and they cite statements to the effect that the section would outlaw discriminatory measures id at 64 this argument is implausible first while 1 ..... and other similar issues rendering judicial intervention both less necessary and potentially more disruptive glucksberg 521 u s at 719 735 conversely we have long appreciated that more searching judicial .....

G. Chandra Sekhar and Others Vs. Maytas Hills County Pvt. Ltd and Othe ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad

..... we hold that the complainant is a consumer within the meaning of sec 2 1 d of the c p act the opposite parties had ..... has stated that he had paid a sum of rs 67 66 521 towards the sale consideration registration charges vat and corpus fund etc the ..... hence the complainant has paid the entire amount of rs 67 66 521 to the opposite parties towards the sale consideration having received the entire .....

Renico Vs. Lett

Court: US Supreme Court

deferential standard for evaluating state court rulings lindh v murphy 521 u s 320 333 n 7 1997 and demands that

Sri.M.J.Thomas Vs. Madhavai Sankaran, W/O.Late Sankaran

Court: Kerala

thottathil b radhakrishnan p bhavadasan jj r f a no 521 of 2008 edated this the 8th day of november 2010

United States Vs. Comstock

Court: US Supreme Court

..... such commitments satisfy due process and other constitutional requirements kansas v hendricks 521 u s 346 363 1997 section 4248 closely resembles the involuntary civil commitment laws that states have enacted ..... into execution one or more of those federal powers actually enumerated in the constitution section 4248 does not fall within any of those powers the government identifies no specific .....

Alok Gupta Vs. M/S Rubfila International Limited

Court: Delhi

..... goods sold and delivered interest can be awarded to the defendant under section 61 2 of sale of goods act considering all the facts and ..... defendant company it is alleged that a sum of rs 13 51 521 is due to the plaintiff whereas the defendant is claiming a sum ..... the plaintiff has accordingly claimed the aforesaid amount of rs 13 51 521 along with pendente lite and future interest on that amount 3 the .....

Shady Grove Orthopedic Associates, P. A. Vs. Allstate Ins. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... concurrence s approach however is itself unfaithful to the statute s terms section 2072 b bans abridgement or modification only of substantive rights but ..... conflict with the rules enabling act amchem products inc v windsor 521 u s 591 612 613 1997 observing that federal rules must ..... is best kept within tolerable limits amchem products inc v windsor 521 u s 591 612 613 1997 see also semtek int l .....

Sheeba Philominal Merlin, and anr. Vs. the Repatriates Co-op Finance a ...

Court: Chennai

..... as follows 13 enforcement of security interest 1 notwithstanding anything contained in section 69 or section 69a of the transfer of property act 1982 4 of 1882 any ..... the said loan account as on 31 10 2009 is rs 12 46 521 13 in para 8 of the additional counter affidavit dated 17 11 ..... proceeds viz rs 33 50 000 still a sum of rs 12 46 521 is due e the bank did not ascertain the facts regarding the alleged .....

Ashok Kumar Todi Vs. Kishwar Jahan and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2011SC1254

..... of a police station to record the information referred to in sub section 1 of section 154 any person can send the information to the superintendent of ..... services u p v sahngoo ram arya and anr 2002 5 scc 521 this court had said that an order directing an enquiry by the ..... engineering services u p v sahngoo ram arya and anr 2002 5 scc 521 61 on going through the affidavits filed by the parties we find .....