Section 521 - Judgment Search Results

Kanigalla Venkata Subba Rao and ors. Vs. Vice-chairman, Vgtm Urban Dev ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2006(5)ALD442; 2006(5)ALT361

..... court having regard to the provisions of the environment protection act 1986 section 521 of hmc act 1955 and the air prevention and control of ..... when once the scheme is published under sub sections 5 and 6 of section 14 under section 19 it shall be the duty of the ..... 3 if any development in an area specified in sub section 7 of section 13 has been commenced in contravention of the master plan .....

Hamdan Vs. Rumsfeld

Court: US Supreme Court

..... deliberate the contrast the stronger the inference as applied for example to contrasting statutory sections originally enacted simultaneously in relevant respects here congress not only considered the respective temporal ..... including a contextual reading of the statutory language may dictate otherwise lindh v murphy 521 u s 320 326 1997 footnote 8 a familiar principle of statutory construction .....

In Re: Rashtriya Ispat Nigam Ltd.

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

..... clause ii of sub section 1 of section 72 or d section 73 or e section 74 or f sub section 3 of section 74a or g sub section 3 of section 80j sub section 2 is only a ..... year 2003 04 the applicant had a net profit of rs 521 crores approximately in terms of sub section 2 of section 115jb the net profit has to be reduced by the business .....

Procter and Gamble Hygiene and Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2006)(111)ECC649

the rg 1 register the penalty of rs 3 98 521 imposed for non accounting of the stock in rg 1

Brown Vs. Sanders

Court: US Supreme Court

upon the invalidated eligibility factors see 51 cal 3d at 521 797 p 2d at 590 sanders argues that the weighing

U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. Vs. National thermal Power

Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Reported in: (2006)LCAPTEL242

..... authority on and after 15 th may 1999 on which dated section 43a 2 of the electricity supply act was amended by act ..... order the said regulatory commission has allowed capitalisation of rs 4 521 crores to the first respondent m s national thermal power corporation ..... substantiated incurring of additional capital to the tune of rs 4 521 crores in firoz gandhi unchahar thermal power station i fgutps i .....

Surendra Kumar Thakur Vs. State Bank of India and ors.

Court: Chhattisgarh

Reported in: (2006)3LLJ431CG

said conduct the petitioner was charged to have violated clause 521 4 j of sastri award read with desai award for

D.C.i.T. Vs. Ruchira Papers Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

..... admissible under section 80g or section 80gga or section 80ggc or section 80hh or section 80hha or section 80hhb or section 80hhc or section 80hhd or section 80 i or section 80 ia or section 80 ib or section 80j or section 80jj ..... law in the case of ipca laboratory ltd 266 itr 521 supra the relevant observations at page 530 are quoted hereunder under section 80hhc 1 the deduction is to be given in .....

Anza Vs. Ideal Steel Supply Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... case we conclude ideal cannot maintain its claim based on 1962 c section 1962 c as noted above forbids conducting or participating in the ..... those businessmen a cause of action cf sedima 473 u s at 521 522 marshall j dissenting yet just like respondent those businessmen would ..... a legitimate business through fraud or the like 473 u s at 521 522 i concede that the approach would rule out a competitor .....

League of United LatIn American Citizens Vs. Perry

Court: US Supreme Court

..... our repeated assurances concerning the discretion and flexibility left to the states section 2 is after all part of the voting rights act not the ..... electorate de grandy supra at 1011 1012 see also abrams v johnson 521 u s 74 91 1997 the general terms of the statutory standard ..... an additional majority minority district should be created see abrams v johnson 521 u s 74 91 92 1997 growe v emison 507 u s .....