Section 521 - Judgment Search Results

Powell Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

the difference between right and wrong page 392 u s 521 following this abbreviated exposition of the problem before it the

Maharashtra State Electricity Board (Through Deputy Chief Engineer, Vi ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1969)71BOMLR206; (1969)IILLJ105Bom

of the two courts in special civil applications nos 520 521 522 523 527 528 529 532 534 535 and 536

The Union of India (Uoi) Owning the Southern Railway, Represented by t ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1969)1MLJ514

..... months time required to be given to the defendant in giving notice under section 80 civil procedure code is excluded the suit should have been filed on 13th january ..... v sitaramaiah i l r 1961 mad 1122 1961 2 m l j 521 a bench of this court has held that under article 30 of the ..... v sitaramaiah i l r 1961 mad 1122 1961 2 m l j 521 the consignee took open delivery of the goods on 21st september 1950 and .....

Malabar Tile Works (Represented by Kerala Varma, Attorney) Vs. Industr ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1970)ILLJ79Ker

v textile labour association ahmedabad 1961 i l l j 521 vide supra make it abundantly clear that only the four

Bumper Vs. North Carolina

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to trial on the issue of guilt by a jury representing a fair cross section of the community witherspoon v illinois ante at 391 u s 523 separate opinion ..... v california 386 u s 18 p 391 u s 550 270 n c 521 155 s e 2d 173 reversed and remanded page 391 u s 544 mr ..... assault and sentenced to consecutive 10 year prison terms footnote 3 270 n c 521 155 s e 2d 173 footnote 4 389 u s 1034 footnote 5 he .....

Hanover Shoe, Inc. Vs. United Shoe Machinery Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... machinery trade and commerce among the several states defendant violated the same section of the law by monopolizing that part of the interstate trade ..... appellant 6 united shoe machinery corp v united states 347 u s 521 1954 united also said that e vidently the court below regarded ..... corp 110 f supp 295 aff d per curiam 347 u s 521 had established the unlawfulness of united s practice of making its .....

Witherspoon Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... question is whether the jury must be impartially drawn from a cross section of the community or whether it can be drawn with systematic and ..... line of neutrality in its quest for a page 391 u s 521 jury capable of imposing the death penalty the state produced a jury ..... organized to return a verdict of death ante at 391 u s 521 citations and footnote omitted the sole reason connecting the two sentences is .....

Greenwald Vs. Wisconsin

Court: US Supreme Court

order to ascertain whether petitioner s page 390 u s 521 statements were voluntary 390 u s north carolina 384 u

Wirtz Vs. Laborers' Union

Court: US Supreme Court

the secretary s authority under 601 29 u s c 521 both supplements his investigative mandate under 402 b and authorizes

Johnson Vs. Massachusetts

Court: US Supreme Court

the circumstances greenwald v wisconsin supra at 390 u s 521 under which it was obtained while the supreme judicial court