Section 521 - Judgment Search Results

Hodel Vs. Virginia Surface Mining

Court: US Supreme Court

..... any time before the end of the reasonable abatement time that would be set under section 521 a 3 of the act c an environmental harm is significant if that harm is ..... of federal performance standards with enforcement responsibility lying with either the state or federal government section 501 a directs the secretary to promulgate regulations establishing an interim regulatory program during which .....

Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1981)22CTR(Kar)91; [1981]6TAXMAN264(Kar)

orderchandrakantaraj urs j 1 petitioner hindustan aeronautics limited is an assessee under the it act 1961 hereinafter referred to as...

M. Kasim Khaleeli Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1983Mad168

a different judge and in that h r a no 521 of 1978 the appellate authority has passed the order thus

Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn. Vs. Mcnary

Court: US Supreme Court

..... deference in state tax matters be limited to the actions enumerated in those sections see h r rep no 1503 75th cong 1st sess 1 1937 81 ..... plain adequate and complete see e g matthews v rodgers 284 u s 521 1932 singer sewing machine co v benedict 229 u s 481 1913 ..... elements of federal jurisdiction are present quoting matthews v rodgers 284 u s 521 284 u s 525 526 1932 footnote 2 27 in perez v ledesma .....

Rostker Vs. Goldberg

Court: US Supreme Court

..... adopted by both houses of congress began by stating article i section 8 of the constitution commits exclusively to the congress the powers ..... report of the senate committee on appropriations on h j res 521 noted that the amount authorized was below the president s ..... and various amici reliance on the legislative history of joint resolution 521 and the activity of the various committees of the 96th .....

Rosewell Vs. LaSalle Nat'l Bank

Court: US Supreme Court

..... authority the cook county board of commissioners passed the following ordinance section 2 real estate is divided into the following assessment classes class ..... the boundary of a speedy remedy pp 450 u s 518 521 e the tax injunction act s overall purpose to limit ..... 17 this argument is discussed infra at 450 u s 518 521 footnote 18 although respondent could have raised federal constitutional claims in .....

Metromedia, Inc. Vs. City of San Diego

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the ban is limited to residential areas to the entire city except its most unsightly sections or is city wide it unquestionably will limit the quantity of communication moreover the interests ..... those same official interests outweigh private interests in noncommercial communications pp 453 u s 517 521 justice brennan joined by justice blackmun concluded that in practical effect the city s ordinance .....

Steagald Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

1 chitty 57 58 2 hale 117 1 russell 519 521 the basic error in the court s treatment of the

Minnick Vs. California Dept. of Corrections

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the creation of various new positions including a supervisor for the human relations section the supervisor human relations section under the direct supervision of the assistant director personnel management and training ..... of other employees in the competition are still weighed fairly and competitively id at 521 157 cal rptr at 268 after concluding that the proof of discrimination was insufficient .....

Alessi Vs. Raybestos-manhattan, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... workers compensation offsets are not among those permitted in that section footnote 8 despite this facial accuracy retirees argument overlooks a ..... of pension provisions challenged here pp 451 u s 509 521 a pension plan provisions for offsets based on workers compensation ..... the irs also has not permitted page 451 u s 521 integration with reimbursement for medical expenses or with fixed sums .....