Section 521 - Judgment Search Results

Vengu Ayyar and anr. Vs. Yegyam Ayyar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1951Mad414; (1950)2MLJ642

..... an award for reconsideration upon certain grounds specified in the section but upon no ethers and by section 521 an award remitted under section 520 becomes void on refusal of the arbitrators to reconsider ..... it section 520 gives no unreserved discretion to a court in the .....

Eichenlaub Vs. Shaughnessy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the united states to wit 1 all aliens who are now interned under section 4067 of the revised statutes of the united states and the proclamations issued ..... argued november 16 17 1949 decided january 16 1950 338 u s 521 certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit ..... u s supreme court eichenlaub v shaughnessy 338 u s 521 1950 united states ex rel eichenlaub v shaughnessy no 3 .....

United States Vs. Fleischman

Court: US Supreme Court

s app d c 388 390 174 f 2d 519 521 the respondent was summoned to produce papers before a congressional

Abas and ors. Vs. Sheolal and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1951Raj26

..... it appears from the above conclusion that the phrase on insufficient grounds occurring in section 95 i a was interpreted to mean without reasonable or probable cause this meaning ..... adam go a i r 28 1941 bom 286 i l r 1941 bom 521 and satish chandra v munilal a i r 19 1932 cal 821 59 cal ..... s co a i r 28 1941 bom 286 i l r 1941 bom 521 it is not necessary to recite the facts of this case in detail as .....

Muhammad Ziaul Haque Vs. Standard Vacuum Oil Company

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 55CWN232

..... license as against this reference is made on behalf of the appellant to section 64 of the indian easements act which provides where a license has ..... the license has spent money in executing works of a permanent nature section 60 indian easements act 9 in the case of dominion of india ..... j 448 and motilal rai v kalu mandar 19 c l j 521 14 the allahabad and lahore high courts have held that mookerjee j .....

Kuriakose Chacko Vs. State

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1951CriLJ470

..... accused harboured an offender and thereby committee an offence punishable under section 207 travanoore penal code the preliminary objection raised before the ..... that the trial of the petitioner therein under section 212 penal code travancore section 207 should be stayed until after the trial ..... trial 3 in pariahan singh v emperor 1944 p w n 521 meredith j of the patna high court took the view .....

Bryan Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in the consideration or decision of this case footnote 1 the succeeding section provided that existing methods of review should regulate the system of appeals ..... no case which has noticed this discrepant language although in the same section footnote 3 rule 29 motion for acquittal a motion for judgment ..... 329 u s 462 see trono v united states 199 u s 521 199 u s 533 534 the judgment of the court of .....

Powell Vs. United States Cartridge Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which any employee was employed in violation of section 6 minimum wages or section 7 maximum hours sec 16 a any person who willfully violations ..... of the goods in question from the hot goods provision of section 15 a 1 this seems clear from the language of the ..... department e g requirements of the congressional page 339 u s 521 approval of estimates and the making of appropriations prior to undertaking .....

Bhuwalka Bros. Ltd. Vs. Fatehchand Murlidhar

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1952Cal294

..... the purposes of para b of the explanation to sub section 2 of section 3 of the ordinance 1 east india jute hessian exchange ..... immediately preceding the date of publication of the notification under sub section 1 prohibiting the making of contracts relating to jute goods futures ..... appeal chandanmull v clive mills co ltd 52 c w n 521 submits that the doctrine of frustration is not half as difficult .....

S. Shamshad Ali Vs. S. Tassawar HussaIn and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1950Raj35; 1950CriLJ1218

present case is in respect of an offence punishable under section 600 penal code the offence is said to be dated