Section 521 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 521 Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.094 seconds)Medtronic, Inc. Vs. Lohr
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-23-1996
..... examples of state or local requirements that are not regarded as preempted by section 521 of the act 1 section 521 a does not preempt state or local requirements of general applicability where ..... requirements that state inspection be permitted of factory records concerning all devices ii generally section 521 a does not preempt a state or local requirement prohibiting the manufacture of adulterated .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Corporation of Hyderabad, Rep. by the Commissioner and ors. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Mar-27-1996
Reported in: 1996(2)ALT630
..... order refusing to grant licence to the writ petitioner respondent under section 521 of the hyderabad municipal corporation act has been set aside it ..... in other respects 2 learned single judge has quoted in full section 521 of the act it provides inter alia that except under ..... store in the premises are not covered by the provisions in section 521 of the act 3 premises in the ordinary interpretation and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Gujarat Vs. Rajesh Kumar Chimanlal Barot and Another
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-05-1996
Reported in: 1996VIAD(SC)289; AIR1996SC2664; [1996]87CompCas919(SC); 1996(6)SCALE14; (1996)5SCC477; [1996]Supp4SCR279
1 delay condoned 2 leave granted 3 the order under appeal is passed by the national consumer disputes redressal commission...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Madhya Pradesh Vs. R.P. Sharma
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-26-1996
Reported in: AIR1996SC2665; [1996(74)FLR2759]; JT1996(9)SC6; (1997)ILLJ1185SC; 1996(5)SCALE814; (1996)10SCC516; [1996]Supp4SCR156; 1996(3)SLJ11(SC); 1997(1)LC92(SC)
order1 leave granted 2 we have heard learned counsel on both sides 3 the respondent a chief engineer had entered...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-17-1996
vmi has remained financially supported by virginia and subject to 521 the control of the virginia general assembly va code ann
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrintz Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-03-1996
..... those three sources in that order in this and the next two sections of this opinion petitioners contend that compelled enlistment of state executive ..... on both constitutional and statutory grounds see district of columbia v train 521 f 2d 971 994 1975 after we granted certiorari to review ..... ing them to puppets of a ventriloquist congress brown v epa 521 f 2d at 839 it is an essential attribute of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Mohan Rao Vs. Asst. General Manager and Disciplinary Authority, Reg ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-19-1996
Reported in: 1996(4)ALT602
..... necessary to extract the relevant paragraph in the award paragraph 521 10 a of section 3 chapter xv of sastry award is reproduced below ..... of fundamental rights the court is aware of the provision of section 36a of the industrial disputes act that in case of doubt ..... enquiry officer rejected the said assistance interpreting the provisions of clause 521 10 a of sastry award read with paragraph 18 28 of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBabhnan Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT West Bengal
Decided on: Nov-05-1996
poona electric supply co ltd vs cit 1965 57 itr 521 sc was distinguished on the ground that the emphasis in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.P. Chandoria Vs. State of M.P. and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-29-1996
Reported in: 1996IVAD(SC)453; AIR1996SC2397; [1996(73)FLR1699]; JT1996(5)SC378; 1996(4)SCALE163; (1996)11SCC173; [1996]3SCR1051; 1996(2)LC326(SC)
tribunal has not granted the relief in o a no 521 of 1988 by order dated december 17 1992 thus this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParmod Kumar Bhatia Vs. Power Finance Corporation Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-01-1996
Reported in: 1997IAD(Delhi)524; 65(1997)DLT91; 1996(39)DRJ646
his terminal dues after deducting a sum of ks 37 521 30p being the left over from the house building advance
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial