Section 521 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 521 Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.127 seconds)Marrama Vs. Citizens Bank of Mass.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-21-2007
..... information required by paragraph 2 of section 521 section 521 2 which has since been amended and redesignated as 521 a 2 see 119 stat 38 ..... this subsection is unenforceable d notwithstanding any other provision of this section a case may not be converted to a case under ..... on the provision the senate report stated subsection a of this section gives the debtor the one time absolute right of conversion .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Bank of India, Rep. by the Assistant General Manager (Pers. and ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-10-2007
Reported in: (2007)2LLJ968Mad
..... bank and if proved would amount to acts of gross misconduct under section 521 4 j of the sastry award read with paragraph 18 28 of ..... and if proved would amount to an act of gross misconduct under section 521 4 j of the sastry award read with paragraph 18 28 of ..... 6 tally with admitted genuine signatures initials and writings marked as section 1 to section 80 it is further seen that the said kasi pw 1 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohanlal Pradhan Vs. State Bank of India and ors.
Court: Guwahati
Decided on: Dec-11-2007
..... cross examination this witness was confirmed he made certain statements under section 161 cr pc before the police in the criminal case to ..... the impugned order of dismissal is against the provision of clause 521 5 a of the sastry award inasmuch as the petitioner was ..... authority in inflicted the penalty upon the petitioner has violated clause 521 of the sastri award by not providing either notice or three .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Raghubir Singh Bisht S/O Shri Vs. the Govt. of N.C.T., Through It ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: May-17-2007
tribunal vide order dated 07 11 2002 in oa nos 521 and 522 of 2002 appreciated that there had been a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShreyans Gems (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Decided on: Mar-09-2007
Reported in: (2007)111TTJ(JP.)959
..... before the lower authorities and it was submitted that provisions of section 145 are inapplicable correct and complete books of account have been ..... 45 366 50 carats rough emerald for producing finished emerald 98 521 carats therefore there is neither any ambiguity nor any mistake in ..... of stones will be 1 11 341 50 cts against 98 521 cts declared the additional production being 12 820 50 cts average .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGonzales Vs. Carhart
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-18-2007
..... increased risk of complications in a hysterotomy as in a cesarean section the doctor removes the fetus by making an incision through the ..... the integrity and ethics of the medical profession washington v glucksberg 521 u s 702 731 moreover casey reaffirmed that the government may ..... when this medical uncertainty persists see e g kansas v hendricks 521 u s 346 360 n 3 this traditional rule is consistent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagdish Ram and ors. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-18-2007
Reported in: 2008ACJ433
..... to be gross the expression rash or negligent act as occurring in section 304 a of indian penal code has to be read as ..... 20 similarly in spring meadows hospital v harjot ahluwalia 1998 ccj 521 sc their lordships of the apex court have considered the distinction ..... unequivocal in stating in spring meadows hospital s case 1998 ccj 521 sc that a bonafide mistake under the circumstances may be excusable .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGracy Thomas Vs. Four Square Estate Private
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Oct-05-2007
Reported in: (2008)141CompCas770
..... serious dispute which however does not fall within the scope of section 167 this section does not empower the company law board to adjudicate any ..... and fifth respondent have also filed a suit in o s no 521 of 2004 before the sub court ernakulam against these respondents wherein ..... filed by the applicant and fifth respondent in o s no 521 of 2004 that after giving notice to the shareholders and the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUttecht Vs. Brown
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-04-2007
..... dissenting millions of americans oppose the death penalty a cross section of virtually every community in the country includes citizens who ..... punishment by selective prosecutorial challenges for cause witherspoon supra at 521 second the state has a strong interest in having jurors ..... selective prosecutorial challenges for cause witherspoon 391 u s at 521 second the state has a strong interest in having .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBell Atlantic Corp. Vs. Twombly
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-21-2007
..... the regulatory environment was too unstable chicago tribune dec 19 2002 business section p 2 cited at complaint 45 app 23 footnote 14 in ..... this state ch 379 120 2 1848 n y laws pp 497 521 substantially similar language appeared in the federal equity rules adopted in ..... on procedural reform drafting pleading rules 57 colum l rev 518 520 521 1957 see also cook statements of fact in pleading under the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial