Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 521 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 521 Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.077 seconds)
Mar 02 2001 (SC)

A.P. Bankers and Pawn Brokers Association Vs. Municipal Corporation of ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-02-2001

Reported in: AIR2001SC1356; JT2001(3)SC421; 2001(2)SCALE427; (2001)3SCC646; [2001]2SCR340

..... thereof 7 it is admitted that the notification is under section 521 e ii section 521 provides for certain things not to be kept and ..... notification dated 11th april 1987 inter alia on the ground that section 521 did not empower the commissioner to notify the trades of ..... life or is likely to create a nuisance i e under section 521 e ii maintenance of cleanliness deciding location and regulating noise .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 21 2001 (HC)

The A.P. Gunnies Merchants Association, Hyderabad and ors. Vs. the Gov ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Jun-21-2001

Reported in: AIR2001AP453

..... obtained licences from the municipal corporation of hyderabad under section 521 of the municipal corporation act 1955 for short the hmc act section 521 of the hmc act inter alia provides that except ..... the said writ petition was disposed of directing the respondents therein to initiate proceedings under section 23 of the environment protection act 1986 pursuant thereto the government issued go rt .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 2001 (FN)

United States Vs. United Foods, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-25-2001

four terms ago in glickman v wileman brothers elliott inc 521 u s 457 1997 the court rejected a first amendment

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 2001 (HC)

JaIn Exports Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State Bank of Saurashtra and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-14-2001

Reported in: 2001VAD(Delhi)957

interest till 8 11 94 21 273 00 32 56 521 00less paid on 8 9 11 94 3 00 000

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 2001 (FN)

Correctional Services Corp. Vs. Malesko

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-27-2001

present in the case before us see richardson v mcknight 521 u s 399 412 1997 denying qualified immunity to private

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 2001 (FN)

Board of Trustees of Univ. of AlA. Vs. Garrett

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-21-2001

..... law is not suffi 377 ciently tailored to address unconstitutional discrimination ante at 372 373 section 5 however grants congress the power to enforce by appropriate legislation the fourteenth amendment s ..... basic constitutionally protected liberty such as free speech see reno v american civil liberties union 521 u s 844 1997 see also post siegel equal protection by law federal antidiscrimination .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 2001 (FN)

Easley Vs. Cromartie

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-18-2001

u s 541 549 1999 lawyer v department of justice 521 u s 567 580 1997 shaw v hunt 517 u

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 07 2001 (HC)

Legal Heirs of Purushottam Gajadhar Upadhyay Vs. Police Commissioner

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Aug-07-2001

Reported in: (2001)4GLR3724

on january 13 1997 3 the deceased spent rs 98 521 for the said treatment and he therefore submitted bills with

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2001 (FN)

Lorillard Tobacco Co. Vs. Reilly

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2001

..... relating to smoking and health other than the statement required by section 1333 of this title shall be required on any cigarette package ..... of speech addressed to adults reno v american civil liberties union 521 u s 844 875 1997 citations omitted see e g bolger ..... not applicable to other speakers reno v american civil liberties union 521 u s 844 868 1997 it emphasized that radio is uniquely .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2001 (FN)

Tyler Vs. Cain

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2001

..... unless the applicant shows that the claim satisfies the requirements of this section 2244 b 2 a a claim presented in a second or successive ..... id at 311 313 plurality opinion see also o dell v netherland 521 u s 151 156 157 1997 the exception relevant here is ..... guarantee of due process protection against fundamental unfairness o dell v netherland 521 u s 151 167 1997 holding that the rule in simmons v .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //