Section 521 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 521 Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.1 seconds)Wygant Vs. Jackson Bd. of Educ.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-19-1986
aeronautical industrial district lodge 727 v campbell 337 u s 521 1949 but they do not involve the critical element here
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChemicoat Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-28-1986
Reported in: 1986(7)ECC236; 1986(25)ELT528(Guj)
127 10 p rs 3 15 606 01 rs 58 521 09 p the plaintiff is entitled to interest on the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrown Vs. North Carolina
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-01-1986
to condemn a man to die 391 u s at 521 88 s ct at 1776 we underscored the importance of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLibrary of Congress Vs. Shaw
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1986
..... s immunity from interest pp 478 u s 320 321 c section 706 k s provision making the united states liable for costs ..... underlying congressional policy franchise tax board supra at 467 u s 521 also supports this conclusion the senate report relevant to the ..... highly formalistic ritualistic franchise tax board supra at 467 u s 521 canon of construction that ignores unmistakable congressional intent and that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLockhart Vs. Mccree
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-05-1986
..... contravened all three of the aforementioned purposes of the fair cross section requirement because these groups were excluded for reasons completely unrelated to ..... death witherspoon v illinois 391 u s 510 391 u s 521 1968 the only venirepersons who could be constitutionally excluded from ..... a verdict of death 391 u s at 391 u s 521 witherspoon had been denied a fair sentencing determination the court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBowen Vs. Roy
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-11-1986
..... the stringent page 476 u s 710 eligibility requirements set forth in sections 5 and 7 of the food stamp act of 1977 and further ..... concurring in mcgowan v maryland 366 u s 420 366 u s 521 1961 justice frankfurter viewed it as important that the challenged statutes ..... at 514 515 argument of deputy attorney general of pennsylvania id at 521 argument of attorney for united states dept of justice record doc .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Smt. Sharda Seshadri
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-1986
Reported in: (1986)16ITD615(Delhi)
..... sold were by succession inheritance or devolution and attracted the provisions of section 49 1 iii for the purpose of determination of capital gains ..... interested parties therefore the assessee filed a suit being suit no 521 of 1975 before the hon ble delhi high court at delhi ..... made by the plantiff that is the assessee in suit no 521 of 1975 became infructuous and was accordingly filed it was under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirefighters Vs. City of Cleveland
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1986
..... and of most importance in a later portion of the same section by section analysis the sponsors explained their view of existing law and the ..... may voluntarily visit upon nonminorities ante at 478 u s 520 521 n 10 and those limits which in my view run parallel ..... providing for race conscious remedial action ante at 478 u s 521 this conclusion rests on the premise that the overriding policy behind .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrown-forman Vs. N.Y. State Liq. Auth.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-03-1986
..... law regulating intoxicating beverages must begin with the twenty first amendment the second section of which provides that the transportation or importation into any state territory ..... be paid for liquor in those states id at 294 u s 521 that the abc law is addressed only to sales of liquor in ..... it but sell it he may not id at 294 u s 521 footnote 2 6 new york has no power to project its legislation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBaker Vs. General Motors Corp.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1986
..... court in this case is not preempted by federal law affirmed footnote 1 section 29 8 of the michigan employment security act mesa provides 8 an ..... 6 the text of the amendments reads in pertinent part article 16 section 2 a new emergency dues all dues are payable during the current ..... satisfied an initial waiting period requirement id at 521 363 n w 2d at 628 footnote 23 id at 521 522 363 n w 2d at 628 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial