Section 521 - Judgment Search Results

Venkatamma (Decd.) (by Legal Heirs) Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Ka ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1979]119ITR298(KAR); [1979]119ITR298(Karn)

srinivasa iyengar j 1 these references relate to the same assessee but for three different assessment years viz 1959 60...

Burks Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

jeopardy protections see trono v united states 199 u s 521 199 u s 533 1905 but see green supra at

Mincey Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... dug bullet fragments out of the walls and floors they pulled up sections of the carpet and removed them for examination every item in the ..... rational choice greenwald v wisconsin 390 u s 519 390 u s 521 to the contrary the undisputed evidence makes clear that mincey wanted ..... questions propounded footnote 3 2 cf greenwald supra at 390 u s 521 by all of these standards enunciated in our previous cases i .....

Butz Vs. Economou

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of a state is adequately protected by a qualified immunity footnote 29 section 1 of the civil rights act of 1871 17 stat 13 ..... the constitutional and statutory rights protected by 1983 mark v groff 521 f 2d 1376 1380 1975 other courts have reached similar conclusions ..... has never been doubted but at least until page 438 u s 521 today immunity has been accorded nevertheless as judge learned hand said .....

California Vs. Southland Royalty Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the commission agreed with this contention relying on the principle established by section 7 b that service may not be abandoned without our permission and ..... in the consideration or decision of the cases page 436 u s 521 mr justice white delivered the opinion of the court in 1925 ..... between the goldsmith and waddell leases see ante at 436 u s 521 n 1 footnote 2 8 southland entered into a contract with .....

Kulko Vs. Superior Ct.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as is apparent from the examples accompanying 37 in the restatement this section was intended to reach wrongful activity outside of the state causing injury ..... causes arising from that effect may be exercised whenever reasonable id at 521 564 p 2d at 356 it went on to hold that such ..... requirements of the federal and state constitutions see 19 cal 3d at 521 522 564 p 2d at 356 footnote 4 as was true in .....

Eastex, Inc. Vs. Nlrb

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on petitioner s property rights from their distribution together with the other sections would be minimal moreover it is undisputed that the union undertook the ..... there involved hudgens v nlrb 424 u s at 424 u s 521 522 n 10 see also central hardware co v nlrb 407 ..... property interests that primarily are implicated hudgens supra at 424 u s 521 522 n 10 as already noted petitioner made no attempt to show .....

United States Vs. LaSalle Nat'l Bank

Court: US Supreme Court

..... intended to design a system with interrelated criminal and civil elements section 7602 derives assertedly without change in meaning footnote 13 from corresponding ..... 548 f 2d 1347 1351351 ca9 1977 united states v zack 521 f 2d 1366 1368 ca9 1975 united states v mccarthy ..... that lurk in summons enforcement proceedings compare united states v zack 521 f 2d at 1367 1368 united states v national state bank .....

Miroyan Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

f 2d 106 ca1 1977 and united states v holmes 521 f 2d 59 ca5 1975 in moore dea agents without

United States Vs. Macdonald

Court: US Supreme Court

barker v wingo 407 u s at 407 u s 521 522 407 u s 530 unlike a double jeopardy claim