Skip to content

Did you mean: section 2?


Section 521 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: section 521 Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.086 seconds)
Apr 01 2005 (HC)

Aashrith Hotels Vs. Assistant Medical Officer of Health

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-01-2005

Reported in: 2005(3)ALD505; 2005(3)ALT536

..... 2001 2scr340 where the apex court held that the purpose of section 521 of hyderabad municipal corporations act 1955 is to ensure that the ..... would be a useless formality and would not be authorized by section 521 and contends that since the business of dealing in alcohol beverages ..... suits cannot be taken away by reading amended provisions of section 32 c into section 10 1 of the act as the amendment act .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 28 2005 (HC)

Y. Venkateswar Rao and ors. Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-28-2005

Reported in: 2006(1)ALD445; 2006(1)ALT443

..... as follows para 8 of ald it is admitted that the notification is under section 521 e ii section 521 provides for certain things not to be kept and certain trades and operations not ..... learned standing counsel for the visakhapatnam municipal corporation sri n ranga reddy placed reliance on section 521 of the hmc act and on the notification published by the commissioner of municipal corporation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 2005 (HC)

M.S. Suresh Vs. Smt. Parvathi

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Feb-17-2005

Reported in: ILR2005KAR1274; 2005(3)KarLJ386

orderk l manjunath j 1 an interesting question that arise for consideration in these writ petition is whether the mother...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 2005 (FN)

Johanns Vs. Livestock Marketing Assn.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-23-2005

not argue that the advertising was permissible government speech see 521 u s at 482 n 2 souter j dissenting noting

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 20 2005 (FN)

Rompilla Vs. Beard

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-20-2005

erroneous but objectively unreasonable wiggins v smith supra at 520 521 quoting williams v taylor supra at 409 internal quotation marks

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 04 2005 (HC)

Sh. Amarjeet Lal Suri Vs. Sh. Moti Sagar Suri and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-04-2005

Reported in: 119(2005)DLT295

..... settlement by and under a document which requires registration 40 under section 17 of the registration act a document creating or extinguishing a ..... would exclusively belong in the ratios to shri devinder nath suri 521 2871 amarjeet lal suri 900 2871 smt varsha sethi 900 2871 ..... mehta in the following respective ratios i shri d n suri 521 2871ii shri amarjit lal suri 900 2871iii mrs varsha sethi 900 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 2005 (HC)

Sankaran Nair Vs. K.S.S.i.D. Corporation Ltd.

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-10-2005

Reported in: [2005(105)FLR803]; 2005(2)KLT245

decision in abdul kareem v canara bank 1991 1 klt 521 requires reconsideration while holding so learned single judge stated as

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 23 2005 (FN)

Johnson Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-23-2005

v farmer 126 ariz 569 570 571 617 p 2d 521 522 523 1980 en banc describ ing murder of a

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 2005 (TRI)

B. Sorabji Vs. Ito, Ward 20(1)(2)

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-23-2005

Reported in: (2005)95ITD540(Mum.)

..... report of an accountant as defined in the explanation below sub section 2 of section 288 certifying that the deduction has been correctly claimed in ..... cit 2004 266 itr 521 sc held as under we are concerned with the wordings of sub section 3 c of section 80hhc it would not ..... ltd 2004 266 itr 521 sc the supreme court was not concerned with the proviso appended to sub section 3 c of section 80hhc as it .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 2005 (FN)

Mayle Vs. Felix

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-23-2005

..... limitations a definition of transaction that is consistent with what other sections of aedpa those governing second or successive petitions functionally regard as ..... rule 15 a see ellzey v united states 324 f 3d 521 526 ca7 2003 aedpa s aim to expedite resolution of collateral ..... explained this tension in ellzey v united states 324 f 3d 521 ca7 2003 and the court offers no evidence that congress would .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //