Section 521 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: section 521 Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.086 seconds)Aashrith Hotels Vs. Assistant Medical Officer of Health
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-2005
Reported in: 2005(3)ALD505; 2005(3)ALT536
..... 2001 2scr340 where the apex court held that the purpose of section 521 of hyderabad municipal corporations act 1955 is to ensure that the ..... would be a useless formality and would not be authorized by section 521 and contends that since the business of dealing in alcohol beverages ..... suits cannot be taken away by reading amended provisions of section 32 c into section 10 1 of the act as the amendment act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTY. Venkateswar Rao and ors. Vs. Prohibition and Excise Superintendent ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Oct-28-2005
Reported in: 2006(1)ALD445; 2006(1)ALT443
..... as follows para 8 of ald it is admitted that the notification is under section 521 e ii section 521 provides for certain things not to be kept and certain trades and operations not ..... learned standing counsel for the visakhapatnam municipal corporation sri n ranga reddy placed reliance on section 521 of the hmc act and on the notification published by the commissioner of municipal corporation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.S. Suresh Vs. Smt. Parvathi
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-17-2005
Reported in: ILR2005KAR1274; 2005(3)KarLJ386
orderk l manjunath j 1 an interesting question that arise for consideration in these writ petition is whether the mother...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJohanns Vs. Livestock Marketing Assn.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-23-2005
not argue that the advertising was permissible government speech see 521 u s at 482 n 2 souter j dissenting noting
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRompilla Vs. Beard
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-2005
erroneous but objectively unreasonable wiggins v smith supra at 520 521 quoting williams v taylor supra at 409 internal quotation marks
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSh. Amarjeet Lal Suri Vs. Sh. Moti Sagar Suri and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-04-2005
Reported in: 119(2005)DLT295
..... settlement by and under a document which requires registration 40 under section 17 of the registration act a document creating or extinguishing a ..... would exclusively belong in the ratios to shri devinder nath suri 521 2871 amarjeet lal suri 900 2871 smt varsha sethi 900 2871 ..... mehta in the following respective ratios i shri d n suri 521 2871ii shri amarjit lal suri 900 2871iii mrs varsha sethi 900 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSankaran Nair Vs. K.S.S.i.D. Corporation Ltd.
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-10-2005
Reported in: [2005(105)FLR803]; 2005(2)KLT245
decision in abdul kareem v canara bank 1991 1 klt 521 requires reconsideration while holding so learned single judge stated as
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJohnson Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-23-2005
v farmer 126 ariz 569 570 571 617 p 2d 521 522 523 1980 en banc describ ing murder of a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTB. Sorabji Vs. Ito, Ward 20(1)(2)
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-23-2005
Reported in: (2005)95ITD540(Mum.)
..... report of an accountant as defined in the explanation below sub section 2 of section 288 certifying that the deduction has been correctly claimed in ..... cit 2004 266 itr 521 sc held as under we are concerned with the wordings of sub section 3 c of section 80hhc it would not ..... ltd 2004 266 itr 521 sc the supreme court was not concerned with the proviso appended to sub section 3 c of section 80hhc as it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMayle Vs. Felix
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-23-2005
..... limitations a definition of transaction that is consistent with what other sections of aedpa those governing second or successive petitions functionally regard as ..... rule 15 a see ellzey v united states 324 f 3d 521 526 ca7 2003 aedpa s aim to expedite resolution of collateral ..... explained this tension in ellzey v united states 324 f 3d 521 ca7 2003 and the court offers no evidence that congress would .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial