Section 521 - Judgment Search Results

Chief General Manager, State Bank of India Vs. Presiding Officer, Indu ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1996(74)FLR2295]

..... committing acts prejudicial to the interests of the bank in terms of section 521 4 j of the sastri award 7 at paragraph 9 of the ..... committing acts prejudicial to the interests of the bank in terms of section 521 4 j of the sastri award 7 at paragraph 9 of ..... in lieu of reinstatement power vested in labour court or tribunal under section 11a to grant relief in appropriate cases not unguided and cannot .....

State of A.P. Vs. S. Vishwanatha Raju and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(2)SC528; 1995(1)SCALE855; (1995)3SCC327; [1995]1SCR529

order1 heard counsel for thr parties 2 delay of 3 years and 178 days is condoned 3 substitution allowed leave...

Adarand Constructors, Inc. Vs. Peandntilde;a

Court: US Supreme Court

..... e g 16 f 3d at 1544 adarand has stipulated that section 502 of the small business act satisfies the evidentiary requirements of ..... qualifications at a competitive disadvantage see fullilove 448 u s at 521 marshall j concurring in judgment i do not believe such ..... that amendment was specifically directed see arndt 14 1 id at 521 522 continuing justice scalia explained why a sound distinction between .....

D.C. Rastogi (Huf) Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)57ITD295(Delhi)

..... not made available to the assessee assessing officer issued fresh notices under section 131 for personal attendance and for furnishing of requisite information persons ..... by shri jagdish lal sharma the amount of rs 1 56 521 was thus treated as income of the assessee from undisclosed sources ..... of the assessee the additions on account of rs 1 56 521 and rs 40 000 claimed to have been received from non .....

United States Vs. Gaudin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 943 1994 we granted certiorari 513 u s 1071 1995 ii section 1001 of title 18 provides whoever in any matter within the ..... relevancy is treated for purposes of determining the admissibility of evi 521 dence says nothing about how relevancy should be treated when like ..... remain the proper domain of the trial court ante at 520 521 preliminary questions in a trial regarding the admissibility of evidence fed .....

Collecter of Central Excise Vs. Maruthi Foam (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(85)ELT157TriDel

..... has allowed the contention of the respondents herein hence the present application under section 35e of the central excises amp salt act 1944 as on the ..... ltd and anr v uoi and ors 1987 32 e l t 521 patna this judgment has been followed by the tribunal in a series ..... of tata yodogawa limited v union of india 1987 32 e l t 521 patna the question arose as to whether ingots which were exempted from .....

Chandris, Inc. Vs. Latsis

Court: US Supreme Court

427 436 ca4 1976 griffith v wheeling pittsburgh steel corp 521 f 2d 31 36 ca3 1975 cert denied 423 u

Ambika Forgings Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1995)(78)ELT352TriDel

..... expression levy in rule 10 means actual collection of some amount the charging provision section 3 1 specifically says there shall be levied and collected in such a ..... j 399 1988 35 e l t 142 1987 32 e l t 521 to interpret the term paid nil rate of duty they have contended that ..... of tata yodogawa ltd v uoi reported in 1987 32 e l t 521 the ld counsel also referred to letter no 345 15 87 tru dated .....

ind-ital Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT1118Tri(Chennai)

association v uoi reported in 1995 77 e l t 521 bom in support of his plea that when a photostat

Khanna Rubber Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT251TriDel

..... barred by time in the absence of suppression of facts nor mention of section 11a or suppression in the show cause notice to invoke larger period but ..... proforma invoice no 80 81 108 dated 29 9 1981 for rs 5 521 00 issued by m s khanna rubbers in favour of m s goverdhan ..... seized the goods in the intercepted tempo of the value of rs 5 521 were also seized on the ground that they had been removed from the .....