Mark - Year 2016 - Judgments

Jun 24 2016 (HC)

M/s. Soudal, Joint Stock Company, Chennai Vs. The Registrar, Trade Mar ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-24-2016

..... dated 23 11 1994 for the registration of its trade mark label mark in series soudal in class 2 paint varnishes lacquers preservatives ..... by the petitioner for renewal of the registration of the trade mark had been returned by the respondent with an endorsement dated 30 ..... to send the notice to the registered proprietor of the trade mark a general public notice is not contemplated under the said section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 15 2016 (HC)

Bharat Raj Sanklecha Vs. M/s. Land Mark Promoters and Another

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-15-2016

prayer this criminal revision petition is filed under sections 397 and 401 of cr p c against the order passed...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 2016 (SC)

State of U.P and Ors. Vs. Dr. Dinesh Singh Chauhan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-16-2016

..... indeed the primary consideration for determining the academic merit of the candidates is the marks obtained by the respective candidates in the common competitive test or centralized competitive test ..... provided when sufficient number of candidates in the respective categories fail to secure minimum marks as prescribed in national eligibility cum entrance test held for any academic year for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 18 2016 (SC)

Vikas Sankhala and Ors Etc Vs. Vikas Kumar Agarwal and Ors Etc

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-18-2016

..... be counted against unreserved category vacancies if in the selection they have secured more marks than the marks obtained by the last unreserved category candidate who is selected irrespective of the ..... be counted against unreserved category vacancies if in the selection they had secured more marks than the marks obtained by the last unreserved category candidate who is selected irrespective of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 2016 (HC)

Ultratech Cement Limited and Another Vs. Dalmia Cement Bharat Limited

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-10-2016

..... the word ultra forms a significant part or essential feature of the plaintiffs registered trade marks a mark is infringed by another trader even if he without using whole of it uses ..... between the two products different trade channels etc apart from the significant difference between the marks themselves and the respective reputations of both manufacturers 6 dr tulzapurkar learned senior counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2016 (HC)

Essel Propack Ltd. Vs. Essel Kitchenware Ltd. and Another

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-11-2016

..... phonetically and joining them together hence essel the plaintiff says it has used this mark extensively since then there has been considerable corporate expansion since several subsidiary and associate ..... clearly equities and special equities are not irrelevant in considering injunction applications in trade mark cases neon laboratories limited v medical technologies limited and ors 2016 2 scc 672 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 2016 (HC)

Federal Brands Ltd. Vs. Levi Strauss India Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-02-2016

..... plaintiff since then it is claimed that the plaintiff s products under the particular trade mark are presently sold through a distribution network of 2600 multi brand outlets and 30 ..... is restrained by an order of temporary injunction from infringing the plaintiff s registered trade marks bearing registration nos 1218197 834840 834841 1418739 1418740 1418741 and 1563387 in terms prayer clause .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 24 2016 (HC)

M/S Az Tech (India) & Anr. Vs.m/s Intex Technologies (India) Ltd. & An ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-24-2016

..... wrongful user of the expression registered in a trade mark when the mark had not been actually registered has come up for ..... in pleadings which disentitles them from injunctive relief d the mark of the plaintiffs aqua is incapable of distinguishing the goods ..... a secondary meaning for seeking protection before this court 26 marks are generally classified into five categories of increasing distinctiveness .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 21 2016 (HC)

Nirog Pharma Pvt Ltd vs.umesh Gupta & Anr

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-21-2016

..... considered a the nature of the marks i e whether the marks are word marks or label marks or composite marks i e both words and label ..... 04 2010 5 the plaintiff submits that of the aforegoing marks the marks in serial nos 1 2 3 and 4 were initially ..... therefore the plaintiff enjoys statutory rights by virtue of the trade mark registrations and common law proprietary rights arising from the goodwill and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 2016 (SC)

Salam Samarjeet Singh Vs. High Court of Manipur at Imphal and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-07-2016

..... evaluating procedure alone for the purpose of deciphering cut off marks or pass marks for the viva voce examination there ought to be a ..... the instructions clearly demonstrate that there was no cut off mark or pass mark for the viva voce examination in the past and ..... the candidate in nine disciplines each discipline carrying 5 55 marks the total marks obtained by the petitioner from each member were 19 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mark - Judgment Search Results