Mark - Judgment Search Results

Kostal, Verwaltungsgellschaft Mbh, Federal Republic of Germany Versus ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... the appellants contented that the appellants obtained registration of their mark lk in various countries throughout the world and they ..... not entitled for the registration the assistant registrar of trade marks on a careful consideration of the materials available on record ..... while adopting their trademark has no knowledge about the appellants mark 10 the next contention of the learned counsel for the .....

Bawa Jagmohan Singh and Others Verus the Registrar of Trade Marks and ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... recorded as subsequent proprietors in respect of the registered trade marks under nos 223079 223400 227794 238239 248562 251489 251470 ..... recordal of their names as subsequent proprietors of registered trade marks under nos 223079 223400 227794 238239 248562 251489 251470 ..... 139 of 2002 against the appellants alleging infringement of trade marks the high court directed the parties to appear before .....

Pidilite Industries Limited and the Registrar of Trade Marks and Anoth ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... the appellant has also obtained copyright registration of the several artistic works containing the trade mark fevicol the prefix fevi and the device of two elephants under the relevant ..... honestly invented coined without any reference to others a fanciful inherently distinctive and different trade mark fevidip for use upon and in relation to medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations and made .....

M/S. Renovision Exports (P) Ltd. Joint Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

..... the appeal against the order passed by the joint registrar of trade marks on 29 04 2009 the matter came up before us at the ..... 5 of the limitation act 6 section 91 3 of the trade marks act 1999 requires the appellant to file the appeal in the prescribed ..... decision appealed against along with prescribed fees rule 8 of the trade marks rules 2002 requires that the appeal shall be accompanied by copies of .....

Percept Talent Management Pvt. Ltd. a company registered under the Com ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(2)ALLMR72; 2008(2)ARBLR49(Bom); 2008(2)BomCR654; 2008(3)MhLj94

..... of test cricket or the increasingly popular t20 exercises the competition on the field is marked by no less a vigorous competitive marketing exercise off the field to the millions of ..... petitioners are concerned is considered in a decision of the supreme court in percept d mark india p ltd v zaheer khan air2006sc3426 the clause in the agreement that was entered .....

Sabita Mark Burges Vs. Mark Lionel Burges

Court: Mumbai

rule made returnable forthwith 1 the petitioner wife has challenged the order of the judge family court no 3 bandra...

N.H. Shivamurthy and Others Vs. Mark Gomez and Others

Court: Karnataka

..... herein had filed an execution petition no 65 2010 against sri mark gomez gpa holder of the four persons namely smt ursila sri ..... and three rtcs relating to certain ancestral properties which were also marked as exhibits o2 to o8 12 02 06 2012the respondent ..... has already tendered his evidence in examination in chief and got marked relevant documents inclusive of will relied upon by him neither .....

Michigan Central R. Co. Vs. Mark Owen and Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... law rules concerning their rights and liabilities the carrier acknowledges receipt of the property described marked consigned and destined as indicated below which said carrier which word is to be understood ..... u s supreme court michigan central r co v mark owen co 256 u s 427 1921 michigan central railroad company v mark owen company no 299 argued april 28 1921 decided .....

Riya Bawri Etc. Etc. Vs. Mark Alexander Davidson

Court: Supreme Court of India

..... the 13 respondent no 1 in the present appeal is mark alexander davidson 14 respondent no 2 in the present appeal ..... the summoning order against the respondents no 1 and 2 18 mark alexander davidson and sarita harish kanchan proceedings against both of ..... is evident that the partnership firm consisted of three partners namely mark alexander davidson and sachhidanand kanchan and the third one was .....

Olga thelma Gomes Vs. Mark Gomes

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1959Cal451,63CWN395

..... decree nisi for dissolution of marriage between the petitioner olga thelma gomes and her husband mark gomes the petitioner filed the petition for dissolution against her husband on the allegation that ..... and the decree nisi for dissolution of marriage between the petitioner olga thelma gomes and mark gomes must be confirmed 5 we place on record our appreciation of the assistance received .....