Mark - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: mark Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.073 seconds)Wockhardt Limited Vs. Aristo Pharmaceuticals Limited
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-1999
Reported in: (1999)2MLJ467
..... in the three cases set out in section 32 the proprietor of an unregistered trade mark whose mark is unauthorisedly used by another cannot however sue for the infringement of such trade ..... being one of the leading manufacturers of the pharmaceutical preparations invented and adopted the trade mark spasmo proxyvon in respect of treatment of certain ailments pertaining to spasms whereas the respondent .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLilly Vs. Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1999
..... the accused i on december 4 1995 three men benjamin lee lilly petitioner his brother mark and mark s roommate gary wayne barker broke into a home and stole nine bottles of ..... that the indicia of reliability the court found coupled with the actions of police during mark s interrogation demonstrate that the circumstances surrounding his statements bore particularized guarantees of trustworthiness .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnil Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-24-1999
Reported in: AIR2000SC659; [2000(84)FLR334]; JT1999(9)SC231; 1999(7)SCALE192; (2000)1SCC128; [1999]Supp4SCR553; 2000(1)SLJ166(SC); (2000)2UPLBEC1014
..... 50 marks 5 marks51 to 60 marks 6 marks61 to 70 marks 7 marks71 to 80 marks 8 marks81 to 90 marks 9 marks91 to 100 marks ..... the experience gained before the date of issuance of the marks certificates or experience gained before the actual announcement of degree ..... was over and before publication of result of be examination or marks certificate could be treated as professional experience 26 in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.K. Kaliappa Gounder Sons Trading as Sun Beedi Traders Represented by ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-07-1999
Reported in: (1999)2MLJ413
..... defendant has any manner of right to use the said mark or similar mark which the plaintiff alone is entitled 24 while so ..... the defendant from interfering with the plaintiff s registered trade mark bearing registration no 168979 and 219421 b as described in ..... defendant and his men from interfering with the plaintiffs registered trade marks bearing nos 168979 and 219421 b to grant yet another .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaji Latif Gani Kachhi Vs. Sangishetty Ramulu
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-28-1999
Reported in: (1999)3MLJ604
..... relation to the goods in respect of which a trade mark is proposed to be registered means adapted to distinguish goods ..... learned advocate for the respondent has submitted that the trade mark sought for by the respondent is completely dissimilar distinctive and ..... learned advocate for the respondent has submitted that the trade marks applied for by the respondent is easily distinguishable with that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBirendra Nath Mondal Vs. Vidyasagar University and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-27-1999
Reported in: AIR1999Cal283
..... no 11 as the candidate actually secured 37 marks in the new mark sheet changed marks were duly incorporated 15 it is the submission ..... that the authority to rectify the mistake in printing the marks on the mark sheet cannot be disputed the change in so far ..... that the petitioner having been furnished the original mark sheet the reduction in marks cannot be effected as the petitioner has acted .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAll India Sc and St Railway Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
Decided on: Aug-23-1999
..... without exhibiting any physical strains each member of the committee was required to award marks separately the marks awarded by each of the four members of the committee were totalled and ..... and scrutinised their marksheets the committee found there were 2016 cases of alteration overwriting of marks by the committee members themselves some changes were attested by the concerned committee member .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe University of Calcutta and ors. Vs. Sk. Monir and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-05-1999
Reported in: (2000)1CALLT205(HC),2000(1)CHN375
..... placed before the vice chancellor with the recommendation for awarding average marks in terms of rules for re examination c it could ..... 8 the report does not spell out how calculation of average marking was arrived at the answer scripts have been destroyed after ..... circumstances the writ court has adopted the procedure of awarding average marks following the decision of the division bench of this high .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHonda Motor Company Limited Vs. Kewal Brothers and anr.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-09-1999
Reported in: 2002(25)PTC763(Cal)
..... both the plaintiff and defendants have got registration in india under the trade and merchandise marks act 1958 their registrations are subsisting till today though the plaintiff has applied for ..... cancellation of the defendants mark in the year 1998 the defendants got the aforesaid trademark registered in about 24th .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTT.H. Musthaffa Vs. M.P. Varghese and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-11-1999
Reported in: AIR2000SC153; 1999(3)CTC569; JT1999(7)SC427; 1999(6)SCALE190; (1999)8SCC692; [1999]Supp3SCR162
..... 300 voters voted using an instrument other than the arrow cross mark stamp prescribed by the election commission the said votes are ..... varikole school and koothmannoor school instrument other than the arrow cross mark rubber stamp had not been used contrary to the one ..... will invalidate the ballot papers while considering question whether the marking of the ballots in this case is made otherwise than .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial