Mark - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: mark Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 311 results (0.074 seconds)Mark 1 Communication. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-25-2012
writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShalimar Chemical Works Limited, an Indian Public Limited Company Vs. ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Apr-04-2012
..... class 30 are highly descriptive and therefore cannot be distinctive while comparing the rival marks the appellants mark consists of the words shalimar which is prominently written along with the ..... campaign during the last sixteen years 4 the consuming public exclusively identified the trade mark chef in relation to various edible products edible oils spices husk edible confectionaries .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKisanlal Bastiram Sarda Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks and Others
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Apr-20-2012
..... and have acquired good will and reputation the appellants have deliberately and dishonestly copied this mark this rectification has been filed only as a counter blast to the opposition proceedings filed ..... and lloyd sales corporation pvt ltd appellants vs fedders corporation and the registrar of trade marks respondents air 1996 sc 2275 vishnnudas trading as vishnudas kishandas appellants vs vazir .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPharma Gmbh Vs. the Joint Registrar Trade Marks and Others
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Apr-20-2012
..... that in deciding a question of similarity between two marks the marks have to be considered as a whole it is ..... when used under normal and fair trading conditions the impugned mark is syntactically unusually juxtaposed and is not a familiar expression ..... involves a combination of objective and subjective elements the impugned mark is not applied for mass consumption products sale of pharmaceutical .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRashid Bhai Vs. the Registrar of Trade Marks and Another
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Aug-08-2012
..... the letter dated 21 7 1993 they also submitted that the mark referred only contains babu bhais photograph but since the dissolution ..... raises such dispute then injunction must be granted that the trade mark belongs to the plaintiff 2 the learned counsel for the ..... who becomes entitled by assignment or transmission to a registered trade mark in the prescribed manner in this case babu bhai became .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNischalâs Klick Selections Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks an ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Jan-31-2012
..... no evidence to indicate likelihood of deception and that the respondents mark with device is distinctive and capable of distinguishing the goods ..... at the result by merely comparing it with the trade mark which is already registered and whose proprietor is offering opposition ..... from 1987 which we have already referred to the appellants mark was registered and a certificate was granted in 1998 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Alembic Limited Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: May-18-2012
..... the case are the appellant herein applied for registration of the trade mark cephbid word per se in class 5 in respect of ..... scheme of the act generally envisages registration or refusal of a trade mark within a definite time frame the question of bonafides of the ..... it was not correct for the registry to involve itself in trade mark dispute sixteen years later otherwise it will result in lack of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Crompton Greaves Limited, Mumbai Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Ne ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Oct-26-2012
..... applicant is manufacturing and selling centrifugal pumps monoblock pumps submersible pumps motors under the trade marks crompton greaves since the year 1967 crompton greaves form part of the applicants corporate and ..... sales turnover runs to several crores of rupees 4 the applicant is using the trade mark crompton greaves since the year 1967 in respect of centrifugal pumps monoblock pumps submersible .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmerican Gem Society Laboratories Llc Vs. the Deputy Registrar of Trad ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Jun-08-2012
..... submitted in response to the examination report and also during the hearing that the trade marks american gem society laboratories and setting the highest standard for diamond grading has ..... lexical invention nor syntactically unusually juxtaposed thus in our considered view both the impugned trade marks are totally devoid of any distinctive character 6 we therefore uphold the order of refusal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Clearlight Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Ma ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: May-18-2012
..... the operative portion of the order reads as follows trade mark refused being aggrieved by the said order of the registrar the ..... appellant of his statutory right to seek protection of his trade mark it was pointed out at the hearing that the competent ..... by the registry without providing adequate reasons for refusing the impugned mark which has resulted in the board discharging the functions of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial