Mark - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: mark Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 311 results (0.074 seconds)Mark Auto Industries Ltd. Vs. C.C.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-13-2003
Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC79
..... of steel during 1999 2000 a lower quantity than the quantity ordered by ms mark auto industries ltd the deputy commissioner allowed discount at the rate of us ..... in india wherein the supplier is m s british steel uk 3 m s mark auto industries ltd challenged this order before the commissioner of customs appeals it ..... 1 m s mark auto industries ltd is a manufacturer of fuel automobile tanks for maruti .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMark Auto Industries Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-28-2003
Reported in: (2003)(153)ELT541TriDel
1 this is an application for rectification of mistake filed by m s mark auto industries ltd for rectification of mistake in tribunal s final order nos 127 128 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMark Auto Industries Vs. Commissioner of C. Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-03-2003
1 this is an application for rectification of mistake filed by m s mark auto industries ltd for rectification of mistake in tribunal s final order no 127 128 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarks Aleli (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-02-2003
Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT809Tri(Mum.)bai
2 in the impugned order the commissioner appeals has dismissed the appeal for non compliance with the provision of section...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMark-lamb Collor Plus Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-2003
Reported in: (2004)(112)LC215Tri(Delhi)
1 appellants filed these appeals against the common order in appeal passed by the commissioner appeals 2 in the present...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMark Pharmaceuticals Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-20-2003
Reported in: (2004)(91)ECC152
1 having examined the records and heard both the sides i find that this case needs to be disposed of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Poona Merchhants Chamber Through President, Shri Madanlal S. Nahar ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-21-2003
Reported in: 2003(2)ALLMR455; 2003(3)BomCR519; (2003)IIILLJ373Bom
for the following scheduled employments namely 1 employment in grocery markets or shops in connection with loading unloading stacking carrying weighing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBio-chem Pharmaceutical Industries Vs. Astron Pharmaceuticals and Assi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-15-2003
Reported in: 2003IIAD(Delhi)41; 102(2003)DLT840; 2003(26)PTC200(Del); 2003(1)RAJ464; [2003]47SCL574(Delhi)
..... a the nature of the marks i e whether the marks are word marks or label marks or composite marks i e both words and ..... phonetically and structurally very close to the appellant s mark spoxin once mark is identical or deceptively similar to the other viz ..... irrelevant and immaterial 14 the learned assistant registrar of trade marks had also ignored the fact that biocilin has acquired reputation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTata Chemicals Limited Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-05-2003
Reported in: 2003(27)PTC422(Del)
..... they appear from the impugned order 7 firstly examining the objections learned registrar of trade marks held that the applicants have successfully submitted evidence of user and reputation in respect of ..... pressure cookers sold by them since 1981 onwards thereforee the mark applied for qualifies for registration 8 learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that tata was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPercept D'Mark (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zaheer Khan and Anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-10-2003
Reported in: 2004(1)ALLMR384; 2004(2)BomCR47; (2006)5CompLJ271(Bom)
..... no 6 the respondent no 1 agreed to wear the trade marks and logos of the petitioner or its clients on the sports ..... be connect with the products beverages of any other brands or trade marks trade names during the subsistence of the agreement including the period ..... permitted to manufacture bottle and sell beverages covered by the trade marks in the area covered by the agreement the supreme court was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial