Skip to content


Mark - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: mark Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 311 results (0.074 seconds)
Jun 13 2003 (TRI)

Mark Auto Industries Ltd. Vs. C.C.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-13-2003

Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC79

..... of steel during 1999 2000 a lower quantity than the quantity ordered by ms mark auto industries ltd the deputy commissioner allowed discount at the rate of us ..... in india wherein the supplier is m s british steel uk 3 m s mark auto industries ltd challenged this order before the commissioner of customs appeals it ..... 1 m s mark auto industries ltd is a manufacturer of fuel automobile tanks for maruti .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2003 (TRI)

Mark Auto Industries Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-28-2003

Reported in: (2003)(153)ELT541TriDel

1 this is an application for rectification of mistake filed by m s mark auto industries ltd for rectification of mistake in tribunal s final order nos 127 128 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 03 2003 (TRI)

Mark Auto Industries Vs. Commissioner of C. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-03-2003

1 this is an application for rectification of mistake filed by m s mark auto industries ltd for rectification of mistake in tribunal s final order no 127 128 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 2003 (TRI)

Marks Aleli (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-02-2003

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT809Tri(Mum.)bai

2 in the impugned order the commissioner appeals has dismissed the appeal for non compliance with the provision of section...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 2003 (TRI)

Mark-lamb Collor Plus Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-04-2003

Reported in: (2004)(112)LC215Tri(Delhi)

1 appellants filed these appeals against the common order in appeal passed by the commissioner appeals 2 in the present...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 20 2003 (TRI)

Mark Pharmaceuticals Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-20-2003

Reported in: (2004)(91)ECC152

1 having examined the records and heard both the sides i find that this case needs to be disposed of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 2003 (HC)

The Poona Merchhants Chamber Through President, Shri Madanlal S. Nahar ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-21-2003

Reported in: 2003(2)ALLMR455; 2003(3)BomCR519; (2003)IIILLJ373Bom

for the following scheduled employments namely 1 employment in grocery markets or shops in connection with loading unloading stacking carrying weighing

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 15 2003 (HC)

Bio-chem Pharmaceutical Industries Vs. Astron Pharmaceuticals and Assi ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-15-2003

Reported in: 2003IIAD(Delhi)41; 102(2003)DLT840; 2003(26)PTC200(Del); 2003(1)RAJ464; [2003]47SCL574(Delhi)

..... a the nature of the marks i e whether the marks are word marks or label marks or composite marks i e both words and ..... phonetically and structurally very close to the appellant s mark spoxin once mark is identical or deceptively similar to the other viz ..... irrelevant and immaterial 14 the learned assistant registrar of trade marks had also ignored the fact that biocilin has acquired reputation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 05 2003 (HC)

Tata Chemicals Limited Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks and anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-05-2003

Reported in: 2003(27)PTC422(Del)

..... they appear from the impugned order 7 firstly examining the objections learned registrar of trade marks held that the applicants have successfully submitted evidence of user and reputation in respect of ..... pressure cookers sold by them since 1981 onwards thereforee the mark applied for qualifies for registration 8 learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that tata was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2003 (HC)

Percept D'Mark (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Zaheer Khan and Anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-10-2003

Reported in: 2004(1)ALLMR384; 2004(2)BomCR47; (2006)5CompLJ271(Bom)

..... no 6 the respondent no 1 agreed to wear the trade marks and logos of the petitioner or its clients on the sports ..... be connect with the products beverages of any other brands or trade marks trade names during the subsistence of the agreement including the period ..... permitted to manufacture bottle and sell beverages covered by the trade marks in the area covered by the agreement the supreme court was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //