Mark - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: mark Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 312 results (0.085 seconds)Sabita Mark Burges Vs. Mark Lionel Burges
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: May-03-2013
rule made returnable forthwith 1 the petitioner wife has challenged the order of the judge family court no 3 bandra...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMarks and Spencer plc and Another Vs. Commissioners for Her Majesty's ...
Court: UK Supreme Court
Decided on: May-22-2013
..... were satisfied 18 here again there is a straightforward application of the principles established by marks and spencer once again the court recognised the legitimate interest which the member states have ..... para 39 it considered all three of the justifications referred to in para 43 of marks and spencer taken together and concluded that the legislation pursued legitimate objectives compatible with the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Societe Des Produits Nestle S.A. a Company Registered Under the L ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Apr-22-2013
..... foods included in class 30 these two marks are label marks and in one mark the words kit kat is written in ..... allowed and the applications are refused registration the impugned trade mark for registration can be considered if the appellants so desire ..... appellants registration the specification of goods under the impugned trade mark are chanachur and preparations made from cereals chanachur is nothing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Haldiram (India) Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. the Registrar of Trade ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
..... only in the year 1965 by haldiram bhujiawala trading as chandmal ganga bishan the said mark was neither distinctive nor capable of being distinguished and therefore was not registerable the ..... in the application for registration has not been satisfied by cogent evidence when the conflicting mark was pending within the knowledge of the respondents the respondents predecessors had not brought it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCipla Limited Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and Another
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-23-2013
..... to restore to the register the petitioner s said trade mark 3 the mark was registered with effect from 6 11 1945 as ..... registered proprietor or in the case of a jointly registered trade mark each of the joint registered proprietors and each registered user ..... respondents are directed to grant restoration and renewal of the trade mark registration cipla no 114794 dated 6th november 1945 within two .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Kaira District Co-operative Milk Producersâ Union Limited Vs ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Mar-07-2013
..... the opposition no cal 206784 under the provisions of the trade marks act 1999 2 the opponent is the appellant herein and the ..... by virtue of long extensive and continuous use the appellants trade mark amul has become associated and identified by the public with the ..... 4 the respondents filed their counter statement stating that their trade mark was basically adopted from their trading style in the year .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVrs Foods Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks Delhi and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
..... to be shown as abandoned in the record of the trade marks registry the petitioner is before this court seeking correction of ..... as abandoned instead of being treated as pending by the trade marks registry vide letter dated 25 8 2008 the petitioner lodged protest ..... the applicant failing to respond to the objections of the trade marks registry the act provides for treating the application to be abandoned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParas Natural Spring Water Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks Delh ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
..... to be shown as abandoned in the record of the trade marks registry the petitioner is before this court seeking correction of ..... as abandoned instead of being treated as pending by the trade marks registry vide letter dated 25 8 2008 the petitioner lodged protest ..... the applicant failing to respond to the objections of the trade marks registry the act provides for treating the application to be abandoned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRashid Bhai Vs. the Registrar of Trade Marks the Registrar of Trade Ma ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
..... the deed of dissolution was with regard to a different trade mark the delhi registry had no jurisdiction to allow the change ..... clearly mentions that one person namely plaintiff shall use the trade mark and the defendant will have no right to use injunction ..... restraining defendant from using the trade mark granted dissolution becomes assignment 3 manu sc 0016 1974 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.S. Raja Vs. the Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Marks Registry I.P.R ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Jun-03-2013
..... in interest we find from the documents that the applicant has been vigilantly protecting his mark in various fora the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that when the goodwill ..... herein and allowed the interlocutory petition and has removed the association with the registered trade mark no 687449 and had ordered re advertisement the respondents herein filed opposition no 763112 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial