Skip to content


Mark - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: mark Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 308 results (0.042 seconds)
Jan 10 2005 (TRI)

Kostal, Verwaltungsgellschaft Mbh, Federal Republic of Germany Versus ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jan-10-2005

..... the appellants contented that the appellants obtained registration of their mark lk in various countries throughout the world and they ..... not entitled for the registration the assistant registrar of trade marks on a careful consideration of the materials available on record ..... while adopting their trademark has no knowledge about the appellants mark 10 the next contention of the learned counsel for the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 2005 (FN)

Mark (Respondent) Vs. Mark (Appellant)

Court: House of Lords

Decided on: Jun-30-2005

lord nicholls of birkenhead 1 i have had the advantage of reading in draft the speeches of my noble and...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 16 2005 (HC)

Acquet Trading Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-16-2005

Reported in: 2006(3)CHN424

kalyan jyoti sengupta j 1 both the writ petitions have similarity on fact and in law as the controversies therein...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 2005 (TRI)

Jolen Inc., U.S.A. Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade M ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jan-12-2005

..... action wherein the application for injunction restraining the second respondent from using the impugned trade mark was dismissed the appellant moved the division bench by way of appeal and the ..... including interalia television radio newspapers and magazines hence the registration and use of the identical mark by the second respondent is bound to cause confusion and deception and consequently the same .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 08 2005 (HC)

Fedders Lloyd Corporation Ltd. and Lloyd Sales Corporation Pvt. Ltd. V ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-08-2005

Reported in: 119(2005)DLT410; 2005(30)PTC353(Del)

..... the application for rectification filed by the appellants under section 46 of trade and merchandise marks act 1958 according to appellants filing or pendency of the suit for infringement cannot shift ..... an agreement between m s lloyds electrical engineering company and fedder quigan corporation the trade mark fedders was claimed by partnership however later on it was assigned and registered in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2005 (TRI)

Mohinder Pal and Others Vs. the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks, New D ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Mar-11-2005

..... has held monika to be the rightful proprietor of the impugned mark vishal the assistant registrar deputy registrar joint registrar and ..... appropriate bodies provided under the act under the trade and merchandise marks act 1958 it was the high courts having the appellate ..... thus the attribute of having gained distinctiveness in relation to mark also goes in favour of monika for similar reasons we .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 19 2005 (TRI)

M/S. Ind Swift Ltd., Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Ahmedabad and Anoth ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Jan-19-2005

..... a the nature of the marks i e whether the marks are word marks or label marks or composite marks i e both words and ..... respondent is not manufacturing any product under the disputed trade mark but however she contended that the appellate board may consider ..... also in writing nature the impugned mark is identical with that the appellants mark both the marks being used in respect of medicinal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 2005 (TRI)

M/S Asian Paints Limited, Mumbai Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Trade ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Feb-10-2005

..... an application being application no 518458 for the registration of trade mark royal touch in class 2 the appellant gave a ..... for the appellant drew our attention to rule 50 of trade marks rules 2002 making provision for filing of evidence in support of ..... respondent pointed out that rule 53 of the trade and merchandise marks rules 1959 has undergone material changes in its new transformation as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 2005 (TRI)

Lalit Kumar Arya Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Trade Marks Registry, N ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Mar-09-2005

..... was allowed and the application for registration of the impugned mark was directed to be proceeded with from the above extracted ..... application of the second respondent for registration of the impugned mark on merits in this case the deputy registrar has simply ..... the application of the second respondent for registration of the impugned mark without assigning any reason and no where in the impugned .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 09 2005 (TRI)

M/S. Classic Equipments (P) Ltd., New Delhi Vs. the Assistant Registra ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Feb-09-2005

..... appeal is against the order passed by the assistant registrar of trade marks new delhi in relation to the tm 13 of the appellant ..... for the respondent from the office of the assistant registrar of trade marks 3 we heard the learned counsel for the appellant he submitted ..... in form o 3 of the approaching expiration of the registered trade mark at the address of their principle place of business in india .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //