Mark - Judgment Search Results

Gopal Prabhu Vs. Mark Aloysius Pereira

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1986KAR924

orderchandrakantaraj urs j 1 this is sub tenant s revision under section 115 of the code of civil procedure and...

Progro Pharmaceuticals (P) Ltd., Madras Vs. Deputy Registrar of Trade ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1986Mad282

..... petition is allowed no costs 9 petition allowed trade and merchandise marks act xlii of 1958 when no outer limit is prescribed ..... the petitioner has been manufacturing a pharmaceutical product and its trade mark was advertised in the journal the third respondent claims to be ..... the adoptee of the trade mark filed its opposition to the first respondent under section 21 of .....

Marrese Vs. Orthopedic Surgeons

Court: US Supreme Court

marrese v orthopedic surgeons 470 u s 373 1985 u s supreme court marrese v orthopedic surgeons 470 u s...

Park N' Fly Inc. Vs. Dollar Park and Fly, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... others 15 15 u s c 1127 a service mark is a mark used in the sale or advertising of services to ..... initially denied petitioner s application because the examiner considered the mark to be merely descriptive petitioner sought reconsideration and successfully persuaded ..... created distinction between offensive and defensive use of an incontestable mark page 469 u s 204 tillamook discussed in dicta the .....

Amalendu Santra Vs. University of Calcutta and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1986Cal153

..... three questions by not answering 2 questions and by giving mark of interrogation against one question it has been further stated ..... books if the authorities after making the evaluation by giving the marks to the petitionerfind that the petitioner is entitled to get ..... surgery if however it is found otherwise after adding the marks the university authorities will consider whether they will allow the .....

Bhagat Ram Sharma Vs. the Himachal Pradesh University and ors.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1987HP21

..... grant of scholarship to respondent no 4 who had obtained lesser marks than the appellant 3 the appellant alleged that the rules ordinances ..... awarded to a candidate who claims less than 55 per cent marks in the aggregate or an equivalent grade point average in ..... award shall be made to the candidate oblianing the highest aggregate marks in the examination or subject concerned but only those candidates .....

Rightway Vs. Rightways Foot Wear and anr.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: AIR1986J& K71

..... india as a result of the plaintiffs investment the plaintiffs trade mark and trade name sic throughout india as a result of the ..... plaintiffs investment the plaintiffs trade mark rightway has acquired goodwill and reputation and they conduct sales ..... label the defdts are misrepresenting the customers about the rightway trade mark and trade name and are giving out that they are .....

United States Vs. Maine

Court: US Supreme Court

..... adopted the definitions contained in the convention in determining the line marking the seaward limit of inland waters of the states see ..... internal waters 5 where the distance between the low water marks of the natural entrance points of a bay exceeds twenty ..... 24 miles long connecting the natural entrance points to a well marked indentation and the line must enclose within the indentation landlocked .....

Lila Krishan Vs. Mani Ram Godara and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC1073; 1985(1)SCALE991; 1985Supp(1)SCC179; [1985]Supp1SCR592; 1986(1)LC581(SC)

..... officers rejecting the two nomination papers have also been produced and marked as exhibits similarly the notice in statutory form 3a as ..... puzzled and bewildered when he was facing cross examination the tick mark appearing above the name of brij bhushan related to the ..... out if brij bhushan s name had been tick marked one more tick mark should inevitably be found in the document similar comments .....

K.G. Khosla Compressors Ltd. Vs. Khosla Extrakting Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1986Delhi181; ILR1985Delhi416

..... industries v banarsi dass goala air1980delhi254 the respondents were the registered proprietor of trade mark elora in respect of watches time pieces clocks and their parts and sold these ..... intended to introduce time pieces the defendants appellants manufactured time pieces with their distinction mark gargan but their business name was elora industries used conspicuously by them in advertisements .....