Mark - Judgment Search Results

Mark Auto Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC110

1 in this cod application the prayer is for condonation of dealy caused in filing the appeal before this tribunal...

Mark Auto Industries Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(72)ECC113

1 assessee is the appellant along with appeal it has also filed petition seeking stay of recovery of the amounts...

Mayil Mark Nilayam Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2001(127)ELT659(Mad)

..... the product is being marketed for pleasant bathing and to avoid prickly heat use puli mark shikkakai thool hence it is clear that the product is appropriately classifiable under chapter sub ..... is packed in sachets and sold in the present case the petitioner manufactures of puli mark seeakkai powder by mixing ingredients mohwa deoiled cake seeakkai usilai leaves soapnut and turmeric in .....

New Bharat Rice Mills Vs. the Registrar of Trade Marks and Another

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000VIIAD(Delhi)1071; 2000(3)ARBLR629(Delhi); 88(2000)DLT110; 2000(56)DRJ560

..... in india and australia 2 respondent applied for registration of this trade mark word device before registrar on 30 8 89 and appellate filed his ..... had passed it on the basis of honest concurrent use of trade mark by respondent 5 a perusal of the order impugned shows that ..... altogether he had found that respondent was a prior user of the mark and had registered it in australia and that provi sions of .....

Bhupinder Singh Vs. Baba Farid University of Health Sciences

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2001P& H102

..... no 3392428 crku475033 it is common case of the parties that the total aggregate marks including the marks of practical and internal assessment of the bams final professional examination are 1850 ..... in that subject sr no name of the petitionersubject of re appearmarks obtainedminimum pass marksgrace marks required to pass inthe subject1 bhopinder singh roll no 3392406 crku435072 leena jain roll .....

Wal-mart Stores, Inc. Vs. Samara Brothers, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... producing elements actionable under 43 a has been held to embrace not just word marks and symbol marks but also trade dress a category that originally included only the packaging or dressing ..... color is not inherently distinctive the attribution of inherent distinctiveness to certain categories of word marks and product packaging derives from the fact that the very purpose of attaching a particular .....

Larsen and Toubro Limited and anr. Vs. Gujarat State Petroleum Corpora ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (2001)2GLR934

..... the appellant l t ltd as non responsiveand awarded them zero mark the relevant part of the minutes of the meeting of the ..... such a financing package will be considered non responsive and no marks will be awarded under this category the committee deliberated the issue ..... consortium arrangement the committee deliberated this issue and decided that one mark be deducted in case of l t on above account .....

La Opala R.G. Ltd. Vs. International Distilleries (i) Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2002(25)PTC206(Cal)

..... remove all such future references the defendant however refused to stop of using such trade mark in respect of alcoholic beverages notwithstanding the objection of the plaintiff and the defendant ..... that expression gilbey s solitaire itself has been recognised and associated with a distinctive trade mark of the defendant is not tenable particularly when the application for registration of such .....

Kuber Khaini Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Prabhoolal Ramratan Das Pvt. Ltd. and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2002(24)PTC135(Cal)

..... for infringement of the petitioner s registered trade mark by using a trade mark and or label whichresembles that of the petitioner ..... also examine the differences and dissimilarities in respect of the mark used by the respondents he submitted that there is no ..... to infringement actions and in particular two devices labels and composite mark according to him there is no question of essential features .....

K. Aravindakshan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ahmedabad

..... norms for selection contending that the weightage of 70 marks for interview and 30 marks for acr fixed was arbitrary and illegal he ..... the supreme court has laid down that the allocation of 20 marks against interview was arbitrary and against law however distinguishing those ..... when the rules do not provide for the allocation of marks under different heads prescribed for a single test it would .....