Mark - Judgment Search Results

Marks Vs. Esperdy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 377 u s 214 1964 u s supreme court marks v esperdy 377 u s 214 1964 377 u s 214 marks v esperdy district director immigration and naturalization service certiorari to .....

The Singer Manufacturing Co. Vs. the Registrar of Trade Marks and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1965Cal417,69CWN947

..... singer manufacturing company the decision of the deputy registrar of trade marks is that designation of goods in application no 170032 for ..... may have regard to the extent to which a trade mark is inherently distinctive or is inherently capable of distinguishing as ..... authorised and the question was not merely one of competing marks and the right inter se of their respective proprietors counsel .....

Habeeb Ahmad Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks, Madras and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1966AP102

..... names of joint proprietors before the commencement of this act the office of the trade marks registry within whose territorial limits the principal place of business in india of the proprietor ..... intellectual property rights jurisdiction sections 2 1 h 3 and 5 of trade and merchandise marks act 1958 petitioner filed petition for rectification and cancellation of trade name respondent objected on .....

Meyers Vs. Thigpen

Court: US Supreme Court

meyers v thigpen 378 u s 554 1964 u s supreme court meyers v thigpen 378 u s 554 1964...

K. Jagannadham Vs. District Collector, Kurnool and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1966AP59

..... was eventually found not to have obtained this requisite number of marks he was not entitled to be retained in service and the ..... furnished by the petitioner no separate mention was made of the marks obtained by the petitioner in the typewriting examination this led to ..... git for the service commission examination asked him to produce separate marks obtained by him in typewriting that was not done on the .....

Seth Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, U. P., and Others.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1966]62ITR44(All)

..... of the counter affidavit of respondent no 4 that identification marks were placed on some books and documents wherever it was ..... thought necessary the respondents thus concede that identification marks were not placed on all the documents which were seized ..... seized documents belonging to another firm and two companies e marks of identification were not put on several documents f the .....

Seth Brothers, Partnership Firm Through Sri Vishwa Nath Vs. the Commis ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1965All487

..... of the counter affidavit of respondent no 4 that identification marks were placed on some books and documents wherever it was ..... thought necessary the respondents thus concede that identification marks were not placed on all the documents which were seized ..... seized documents belonging to another firm and two companies e marks of identification were not put on several documents f the .....

Ganga Ram Vs. Het Ram and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1965Raj47

..... the plaintiff hetram further averred that he had merely put his thumb mark on the khata contained in the plaintiff s book of account ..... plaintiff after exercising undue influence on one occasion had obtained a thumb mark in his bahi he was told that it was the account ..... else stand admitted rather the case set out is that this thumb mark was obtained by undue influence that there was no stipulation of .....

Bhagwan Singh Vs. the State and anr.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1965P& H86; 1965CriLJ205

..... petitioner has been tried by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction 10 the punjab commodities price marking and display order 1962 for the contravention of which the petitioner has been convicted ..... authority be best adopted for informing persons whom the order concerns the punjab commodities price marking and display order 1962 was published in there punjab government gazette extraordinary dated 1st .....

Sardar Mal Vs. Smt. Gayatri Devi

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1964Raj223

..... section 83 i b were given in three annexures to the petition marked a b and c an affidavit in support of the allegations of ..... second section of the ballot act provided that the voter leaving secretly marked his vote on the paper and folded it up so as to ..... was in this context that his lordship observed that the manner of marking the ballot paper was obeyed substantially what he really meant to say .....