Mark - Year 1996 - Judgments

Apr 16 1996 (HC)

Mark Laboratories and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Apr-16-1996

Reported in: (1997)1GLR360

j n bhatt j 1 the petitioners have questioned the legality and validity of the judgment and order passed by...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 17 1996 (HC)

Fathima Tiles Vs. Sudarsan Trading Co. and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-17-1996

Reported in: (1996)2MLJ580

..... now be read in light of the lords decision in ge trade mark a mark will be expungcable for subsequent deceptiveness only if its proprietor has been ..... wording of the u k act 1938 reads as follows trade mark means a mark used or proposed to be used in relation to goods for ..... goods upon the market and yet may cause them to be marked with his mark it is submitted that the wording of the present act is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 12 1996 (TRI)

Miaami Pharma and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-12-1996

Reported in: (1999)(108)ELT788TriDel

..... in the register as proprietor of the trade mark a registered trade mark means a trade mark which is actually on the register referring to ..... asked for in respect of all products both the product mark and house mark will appear side by side on all the labels ..... of manufacturer generally it did not establish any relationship between the mark and medicine for instance if the appellant instead of using .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 1996 (HC)

Chandrasekharan Vs. Babu Machine Works, a Partnership Firm

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-25-1996

Reported in: (1996)1MLJ613

..... it has become associated with the petitioner s goods in the mark the trade mark used by the first respondent is not similar to that ..... law that in deciding a question of similarity between the two marks the marks have to be considered as a whole and we have to ..... has started manufacturing and marketing the hand pumps using a trade mark which is similar and deceptive to that of the petitioner and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 1996 (HC)

Carter Wallace Inc. Vs. Mod Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-05-1996

Reported in: 1997IAD(Delhi)149; 1997(1)ARBLR192(Delhi); 65(1997)DLT858

..... rules intruding inter alias hair removers so as to infringe the plaintiff s registered trade mark near b that the defendante by themselves their servants agents distributors and stockists be restrained ..... rules including inter alias hair removers so as to infringe the plaintiff s registered trade mark near 2 the defendants by themsevles their servants agents distributors and stockists are restrained .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 10 1996 (HC)

K. Ramanathan (Died) and ors. Vs. B.K. Nalini Jayanthi

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-10-1996

Reported in: 1996(2)CTC700

..... proving the contents of the documents so exhibited according to him the consent given for marking the documents will only absolve the parties from formally proving the documents and nothing ..... and pareekanni rubbers ltd v state of kerala air1990sc2192 while considering the determination of the marked value in a land acquisition case the supreme court suggested certain features viz the relationship .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 1996 (HC)

Relly Susan Mathew Vs. Controller of Entrance Examinations, Trivandrum ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Dec-13-1996

Reported in: AIR1997Ker218

..... the controller of entrance examinations the controller of entrance examinations will add these marks to the marks obtained by the respective candidates in the entrance examination and the rank list ..... the controller of entrance examinations the controller of entrance examinations will add these marks to the marks obtained by the respective candidates in the entrance examination and the select and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 06 1996 (TRI)

In Re: P. No. 22 of 1996

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

Decided on: May-06-1996

Reported in: (1999)238ITR99AAR

..... which is not clear the proprietary interest in the above trade mark it would seem that in pursuance of a microwave technical assistance ..... source in india the applicant s representative submitted that the trade mark is not so used but it is difficult to accept this ..... licence agreement itself recites that c desires to use the trade mark in india through ic in respect of refrigerators and other licensed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 09 1996 (HC)

Dr. Hemanta Chandra Panda and ors., Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Orissa and ...

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Dec-09-1996

Reported in: AIR1997Ori98

..... of the prospectus provided that candidates securing less than 50 marks 40 marks in case of s c s t in the ..... fulfilling the eligibility requirements invalid ii is the minimum qualifying marks fixed for in service candidates discriminatory iii whether the unfilled ..... eligibility requirements 7 question no ii fixing of minimum qualifying marks for in service candidates clause 11 2 of the prospectus .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 1996 (HC)

Sanjeev Kumar Vs. Punjab University and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Apr-09-1996

Reported in: (1996)113PLR669

..... education haryana or its equivalent examination with atleast 50 percent aggregate marks it is also true that the petitioner who had applied ..... in the general category had secured only 42 percent marks it is also not disputed that the petitioner in his ..... to diploma in education the condition regarding having obtained 50 percent marks in 10 plus 2 examination appears to have been prescribed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mark - Judgment Search Results