Skip to content


Mark - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: mark Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.047 seconds)
Apr 24 1968 (HC)

Prem N. Mayor and ors. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-24-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Cal80

..... recognised that in deciding a question of similarity between two marks the marks have to be considered as a whole it is the ..... described above was based on the contention that that mark resembled the registered trade mark of the appellant and there was likelihood of confusion ..... may be either in individual features or in general arrangement a mark should therefore be considered as a whole on its total .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 28 1968 (HC)

imperial Tobacco Co. of India Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Trade Marks and an ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-28-1968

Reported in: AIR1968Cal582,73CWN169

..... whether the evidence was sufficient to prove that the mark was a mark adapted to distinguish the roods of the respondents from ..... consideration under section 9 5 a is when a trade mark is inherently distinctive or is inherently capable of distinguishing the ..... the pre sent capability of distinguishing in determining whether a mark is capable of distinguishing it is not mere future speculation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1968

Morse Vs. Boswell

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1968

morse v boswell 393 u s 802 1968 u s supreme court morse v boswell 393 u s 802 1968...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

1968

Morris Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-01-1968

morris v florida 393 u s 850 1968 u s supreme court morris v florida 393 u s 850 1968...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 17 1968 (HC)

B.S. Ramappa and anr. Vs. B. Monappa, Trading as Indian National Tile ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-17-1968

Reported in: (1969)2MLJ38

..... holding that monappa had become the proprietor of the trade mark sought to be registered by long open continuous and ..... registrar permitting registration by more than one proprietor of trade marks which are identical or nearly resemble each other in ..... exclude assignments to different assignees of confusingly similar marks or assignments of a mark to different assignees for different but similar goods .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 1968 (HC)

Aktiebolaget Jonkoping Vulcan Vs. V.S.V. Palanichamy Nadar and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jun-06-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Cal43,73CWN347

..... exists with an intention to abandon the use of the mark then the mark can be struck off this was not a war ..... indian registration and its statutory conditions under the indian trade mark and merchandise marks act 1958 28 it is therefore clear that the ..... the part of an applicant to use when circumstances permit a mark temporarily debarred from use because of prevailing difficulties and uncertainties .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 14 1968 (HC)

Mac. Laboratories Private Ltd. Vs. American Home Products Corporation ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-14-1968

Reported in: AIR1969Cal342

..... as it does to an application to register a mark this observation marks the crucial distinction in this case bostitch s case ..... preparations this application of the appellant for registration of the mark tristine was opposed of the american company on the ground ..... as the whitehall laboratories were shown as proprietors oe the mark on the carton quoted above the respondent american company american .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 01 1968 (HC)

S.M. Mohandas Vs. Esso Standard Eastern Inc.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-01-1968

Reported in: (1973)ILLJ59Mad

..... sent a further communication to mr howard which has been marked as ex p 12 in that communication he reiterated his request for ..... the receipts enclosed along with the cheques but sent independent receipts marked exts p 28 and p 29 stating that he was receiving the ..... manager by a communication dated june 29 1959 which has been marked as ex p 2 there were two important conditions namely 1 promotion .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 1968 (HC)

Hazarimal L. Shah Vs. Phillips India Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-01-1968

Reported in: 1969CriLJ1167

..... registered firm manufacturing and dealing in all varieties of electrical goods under the distinctive trade mark philips is the complainant in this case they are manufacturers of electrical lamps of 100 ..... at the distinction between genuine and spurious bulbs and that he purchased bulbs without any marks from bulba suppliers he further stated that he did not notice the differences between genuine .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 1968 (HC)

New Saurashtra Vanaspati Co., Morvi Vs. B.A. Maharaja, Sales Tax Offic ...

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Jul-11-1968

Reported in: [1969]24STC92(Guj)

..... the place of the factory the name of the business trade marks quota rights etc are obtained by the new lessee thus the ..... the rights to this business of running this factory with its trade marks and quota rights remained vested in the company which never continued ..... favour of the leasehold rights along with the incidental rights trade marks and quota rights by the lessor company and it was not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //