Differentiator - Year 2016 - Judgments

Nov 11 2016 (SC)

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-11-2016

..... and application 245 it is trite law that every discrimination involves a differentiation but every differentiation does not implicate discrimination digvijay cement v state of rajasthan 183 the ..... state legislatures to impose non discriminatory taxes on goods thus article 304 a differentiates between discriminatory and non discriminatory taxes the premise underlying this provision is the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 26 2016 (SC)

State of Punjab and Ors Vs. Jagjit Singh and Ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-26-2016

..... reasonably on an intelligible criterion which has a rational nexus with the object of differentiation such differentiation will not amount to discrimination the principle is not always easy to apply as ..... bonafide reasonable and on intelligible criteria which has a rational nexus of objective of differentiation such differentiation will not amount to discrimination it is not prohibited in law to have .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 2016 (HC)

K.M. Chikkathayamma and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Urban Devel ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-10-2016

..... to attract the operation of the class it is necessary to show selection or differentiation unreasonableness or arbitrariness discrimination can be made in respect of the same class of ..... merely sufficient that the legislature concerned has made classifications on the basis of an intelligible differential but it is also additionally necessary that such classification has a rational nexus to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 2016 (HC)

M/s. J.B. Overseas Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-08-2016

..... furnish inter alia a bank guarantee bg for 100 ofthe duty differential for provisional clearance of the goods thirdly the court also ..... of customs pda regulations 2011 and bank guarantee of 50 of differential duty in terms of regulation 4 of customs pda regulations ..... provisional assessment the insistence on a bank guarantee for the entire differential duty appears to be contrary to regulation 2 2 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 2016 (HC)

The Bullion and Jewellers Association (Regd.) and Another Vs. Union of ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Apr-26-2016

..... follow the earlier circular but further demand a bank guarantee of 100 of the duty differential while making such provisional assessment both these circulars are under challenge in the present ..... included indonesia the preamble of the asean fta reiterates that the importance of special and differential treatment to ensure the increasing participation to the new asean member states in economic .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 2016 (HC)

Smt K M Chikkathayamma Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-10-2016

..... sufficient that the legislature concerned has made classifications on the basis of an intelligible differential but it is also additionally necessary that such classification has a rational nexus to ..... discriminatory and unconstitutional it cannot be a defence to state that other legislations also differentiate between classes of land owners moreover the classification under section 24 of the la .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 05 2016 (SC)

Sai Bhaskar Iron Ltd. Vs. A.P.Elect.Regul.Commission and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-05-2016

..... tariff under this act show undue preference to any consumer of electricity but may differentiate according to the consumer s load factor power factor voltage total consumption of electricity ..... of electricity and for retail sale of electricity section 62 3 enables the commission to differentiate according to consumer s load factor power factor voltage total consumption of electricity geographical .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 18 2016 (HC)

Ramesh Gajanan Nigudkar Vs. The Bank of Baroda

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-18-2016

..... was accepted by the 1st respondent and only because the petitioner could not submit the differential provident fund amount within the said stipulated three days it cannot result in pensionary benefits ..... mitigate the hardship which would be caused to a retired employee in refunding the said differential amount however by the impugned action the 1st respondent has taken away and or rendered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 2016 (HC)

V.S. Ekambaram and Others Vs. The Appellate Authority, Chennai and Oth ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Aug-03-2016

..... to this case also the controlling authority subsequently computed the differential gratuity against which the bank has gone to the high ..... of the above developments they have filed similar claims for differential gratuity in 1994 95 before the third respondent employer under ..... claim but kept quiet however they filed the application for differential gratuity in form n within 90 days from the date .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 2016 (HC)

Kendriya Vidyalaya Parents Association, rep. by its President Vs. Kend ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-21-2016

..... sponsoring authority and has allowed the discretion of adoption of differential fee structure such order permitting the same is not under ..... development and ors 2003 103 dlt 389 db wherein the differential fee structure between wards of ntpc employees and wards ..... third respondent 21 therefore on an overall consideration though the differential fee structure is not discriminatory and the circular dated .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Differentiator - Judgment Search Results