Differentiator - Judgment Search Results

Sailendra Nath Roy Chowdhury Vs. Md. Alim and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1983Cal180,87CWN271

ordernirmal chandra mukherji j 1 this rule arises on an application under section 115 of the code and is directed...

Workmen of Buckingham and Carnatic Mills and ors. Vs. State of Tamil N ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1984)ILLJ551SC; 1984Supp(1)SCC622

..... the same manner as notifications issued after that date art 14 does not strike at differentiation caused by the enactment of a law between transactions governed thereby and those which are .....

Krapa Rangiah Vs. Special Deputy Collector, Land Acquisition

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC877; 1982(1)SCALE548; (1982)2SCC374

..... has no application in india section 3 appreciation of evidence discrepancies held court has to differentiate between normal and material discrepancies while normal discrepancies do not corrode credibility of a partys .....

Toll Vs. Moreno

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the university of maryland to grant in state status for admission tuition and charge differential purposes to united states citizens and to immigrant aliens lawfully admitted for permanent ..... preventing disparate treatment among categories of nonimmigrants with respect to admissions tuition and charge differentials id at 173a 174a following the maryland court of appeals decision the case returned .....

Pullman-standard Vs. Swint

Court: US Supreme Court

..... however is specifically precluded by 703 h in title vii cases challenging seniority systems differentials among employees that result from a seniority system are not unlawful employment practices ..... to be concentrated in less desirable positions the district court concluded however that this differential impact was irrelevant in determining whether the seniority system operated neutrally the court of .....

Vikas Enterprises and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1982All236

..... from others who are left out of the group 2 such differentiation must have a rational relation to the object sought to be ..... supreme court we are however firstly of the view that the differentiation does not have any rational relation to the object sought to ..... the aforesaid order there is in our opinion no nexus between the differentiation which is the basis of the classification and the object of .....

Washington Vs. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

..... hands by placing power over desegregative busing at the state level the initiative thus differentiates between the treatment of problems involving racial matters and that afforded other problems in ..... by placing power over desegregative busing at the state level then initiative 350 plainly differentiates between the treatment of problems involving racial matters and that afforded other problems in .....

City of Port Arthur Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to rely on two factors for its conclusion a slight differential between the percentage of black seats and the percentage of ..... black voting age population and a larger differential between the percentage of black seats and the percentage of ..... 19 1976 marshall j dissenting approving representation voting age population differential of 6 moreover the court s conclusion that the 4 .....

Plyler Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

..... when faced with an equal protection challenge respecting a state s differential treatment of aliens the courts must be attentive to congressional ..... power might well affect the state s prerogatives to afford differential treatment to a particular class of aliens but we are ..... its finite resources a state has a legitimate reason to differentiate between persons page 457 u s 244 who are lawfully .....

American Tobacco Co. Vs. Patterson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... disparate impact of a bona fide seniority system even if the differential treatment is the result of pre act racially discriminatory employment ..... unlawful employment practice under this subchapter for any employer to differentiate upon the basis of sex in determining the amount of ..... to be paid to employees of such employer if such differentiation is authorized by the provisions of section 206 d of .....