Differentiator - Judgment Search Results

Munshi Ram Vs. Narsi Ram and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1983SC271; 1983(1)SCALE11; (1983)2SCC8; [1983]2SCR233

..... 1 to be a valid classification it must not only be founded on an intelligible differential which distinguishes persons and things that are grouped together from others left out of the ..... 11 4 a and not under s 11a 1 683 c b the classification and differential treatment of registered and unregistered dealers are based on substantial difference having a reasonable relation .....

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. Lakshmi Brahman and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1983SC439; 1983CriLJ839; 1983(1)Crimes797(SC); 1983(1)SCALE274; (1983)2SCC372; [1983]2SCR537

..... has no application in india section 3 appreciation of evidence discrepancies held court has to differentiate between normal and material discrepancies while normal discrepancies do not corrode credibility of a partys .....

Raj Kumar Vs. Prescribed Authority, Moradabad and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1983(1)SCALE240; (1983)2SCC254

..... citizens the guarantee of equal protection clause of the constitution does not extend to any differential treatment which may result in the application of a special rule of interpretation between the .....

State of Gujarat Vs. Naginbhai Dhulabhai Patel and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1983SC839; 1983CriLJ1112; 1983(2)Crimes332(SC); (1983)2GLR1189; 1983(1)SCALE569; (1983)3SCC316

..... the same manner as notifications issued after that date art 14 does not strike at differentiation caused by the enactment of a law between transactions governed thereby and those which are .....

Minneapolis Star Vs. Minnesota Comm'r

Court: US Supreme Court

..... political system that the press will often serve as an important restraint on government moreover differential treatment unless justified by some special characteristic of the press suggests that the goal ..... subjected governmental action to the most stringent constitutional review solely on the basis of differential treatment of particular groups the case relied on by the court police department of .....

Arizona Governing Comm. Vs. Norris

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of pregnancy constitutes sex discrimination because it is the capacity to become pregnant which primarily differentiates the female from the male id at 429 u s 162 stevens j dissenting the ..... individual but as justice blackmun has stated life expectancy is a nonstigmatizing factor that demonstrably differentiates females from males and that is not measurable on an individual basis t here is .....

Pushpadharan Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (1984)ILLJ417Ker

..... graduate assistants grade iii who entered service on direct recruitment and there cannot be any differentiation on the basis of the source of recruitment the classification on the basis of the ..... from which they are drawn the test of educational qualifications can conceivably be an intelligible differentiate bearing nexus with the object of ensuring greater efficiency in public services but once a .....

V. Ponnusamv and ors. Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1984Mad156; (1983)IIMLJ459

..... rational relation jn the matter of attantum of comdensation between one dublic vurdose and another differentiation between owners was imdrouer 22 in om prakash case 1974 2scr731 it was observed at ..... nexus between the davment of lesser comdensation and the obiect of acquisition there cannot be differential treatment with regard to the davment of coravensation and the other doints of distinction noted .....

Gujarat Machinery Manufactures Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1983)(13)ELT1249TriDel

..... went beyond the ambit of the show cause notice and demanded differential duty for the entire past period was incorrect and illegal ..... decision reported in 1981 elt 958 therefore shri khosla concluded that differential duty could not be recovered in respect of even six ..... period and there should be no bar against recovery of the differential duty on the issue of classification shri k v kunhikrishnan .....

Newport News Shipbuilding Co. Vs. Eeoc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... discrimination based on sex but also rejected the reasoning employed in that case that differential treatment of pregnancy is not gender based discrimination because only women can become pregnant ..... coverage for male and female employees themselves for all medical conditions but it differentiated between female employees and spouses of male employees in its provision of pregnancy related .....