Differentiator - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: differentiator Year: 2008 Page 1 of about 394 results (0.006 seconds)Department of Revenue of Ky. Vs. Davis
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-19-2008
..... bonds respondents sued petitioners hereinafter kentucky for a refund claiming that kentucky s differential tax impermissibly discriminated against interstate commerce the trial court ruled for kentucky ..... elimination financing for long term municipal improvements would thus change radically if the differential tax feature disappeared footnote 19 this probable indispensability of the current scheme .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEngquist Vs. Oregon Dept. of Agriculture
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-09-2008
..... standard against which departures even for a single plaintiff could be readily assessed this differential treatment raised a concern of arbitrary classification and therefore required that the state provide ..... suddenly become the basis for a federal constitutional claim indeed an allegation of arbitrary differential treatment could be made in nearly every instance of an assertedly wrongful employment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKentucky Retirement Systems Vs. Eeoc
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-19-2008
..... a disparate treatment claim under the adea must adduce sufficient evidence to show that the differential treatment was actually motivated by age not pension status and our discussion of the ..... trait by interpreting hazen paper to say that a formal facial explicit mandated age based differential does not suffice to establish a disparate treatment violation subject to statutory defenses and exemptions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManoj Kumar Pandya Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-25-2008
Reported in: 2008(3)MPHT343
..... 4 learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that the aforesaid rules are discriminatory and differentiation created has no rationale behind it the qualification of b ed is superior qualification ..... he has been so treated from persons similarly circumstanced without any reasonable basis and such differential treatment is unjustifiable one in danthuluri ramaraju and ors v the state of andhra .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindustrial Cables Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-16-2008
Reported in: [2009]21STT274
..... no 177 86 ce dated 1 3 1986 and therefore the differential credit of additional duty of customs amounting to rs 22 83 ..... that there was a situation which necessitated taking of credit of differential amounts of duty subsequent to the date of taking of credit ..... was recorded that no new situation had arisen necessitating taking of differential credit between the date of taking credit and the date of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Jan-08-2008
Reported in: (2008)(127)ECC81
..... contract of affreightment coa d the commissioner having jurisdiction over vadinar port has confirmed differential duties of varying amounts along with interest through the orders referred above he ..... of commissioner of customs jamnagar therefore the commissioner jamnagar has no jurisdiction to demand differential duty in respect of clearances effected from warehouses situated in the jurisdiction of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKundan Rice Mills Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-05-2008
Reported in: (2008)152PLR502
..... signing any contract with overseas suppliers and he deposited amount of rs 2 crores towards differential customs duty voluntarily investigation conducted revealed that valuation declared by the petitioner was not correct ..... other conditions imposed in the above letter 24 we further direct that after adjusting the differential duty mentioned in the above letter the rest of the money deposited by the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMula Pravara Electric Vs. Maharashtra Electricity
Court: Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL
Decided on: Jan-28-2008
Reported in: (2008)LCAPTEL135
..... maharashtra across all licensees he said that section 62 3 permits the commission to fix differential tariffs for consumers he controverted the contention that the commission in its order dated july ..... the tariff under this act show undue preference to any consumer of electricity but may differentiate according to the consumer s load factor power factor voltage total consumption of electricity during .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPradeep Kumar Sahoo Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Aug-27-2008
Reported in: AIR2010Ori26
..... to deposit the additional performance security to the extent of differential cost of 90 of the admitted cost 3 for better ..... can deposit the additional performance security to the extent of differential cost if it is seriously unbalanced therefore the authority without ..... deposit the additional performance security to the extent of the differential cost of the bid amount and 90 of the estimated .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Management of Apsrtc Rep. by Its Vice Chairman and Managing Direct ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-22-2008
Reported in: 2008(4)ALD422; 2008(3)ALT774; (2009)ILLJ439AP
..... not entitled to raise the dispute with regards payment of differential ex gratia that there was no industrial dispute in ..... is only with regards payment of ex gratia representing the differential amount payable under the pre amended and the amended payment ..... examined whether the petitioner corporation had in not paying the differential ex gratia altered the conditions of service of its employees .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial