Differentiator - Judgment Search Results

V.G. Row Vs. the State of Madras

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1951Mad147; (1951)IMLJ628

..... the separation of powers the establishment of three separate independent agencies of govt functionally differentiated from one another the supremacy of the judiciary became the established rule of the ..... most cases treated together in considering the constitutional validity of legislative enactments only occasionally differentiated in not a few cases the cts have referred to both prohibitions leaving .....

Snyder Vs. Buck

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for the purposes of the litigation is the united states the reason for the differentiation disappears the differentiation remains in actions brought against officials for remedies which could not be got in ..... thompson v united states 103 u s 480 to be sure mr justice bradley there differentiated his identification of an officer of a municipality with the municipality from the situation of .....

Moti Lal and ors. Vs. the Government of the State of Uttar Pradesh and ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1951All257

..... they were the same tigner v texas 310 u s 141 differentiation on the basis of classifications or groupings on well recognised ..... 2 draws a distinction between a person and authority article 287 differentiates between a person and the government or state in article ..... think not in principles i can see no justification for any differentiation the principle enunciated is of equality and it should apply .....

Sashi Bhusan Singha Vs. Sankar Mahato

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1950Cal252,54CWN936

..... alienation stood on the same footing as the question of voluntary alienation and that no differentiation had been made as detailed in the historical analysis of the case law on the ..... involuntary sales it will not be proper to introduce such a differentiation in section 26f of the act unless such differentiation is clearly indicated in the section itself and there is no .....

Province of Bombay Vs. Kusaldas S. Advani and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1950SC222; (1951)53BOMLR1; (1950)IIMLJ703(SC); [1950]1SCR621

..... judicial act it was suggested so far as i understood the argument which attempts to differentiate this application from an application for a public house licence that there is not provided ..... by the same external standard 78 this is the essence of a judicial function which differentiates it from an administrative function and whether an authority is required to exercise one kind .....

The Provincial Government of Madras, Represented by the Collector of B ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad521

..... does not become a seller or buyer himself 40 the learned advocate general sought to differentiate between different types of agents according as they were brokers or commission agents agents of .....

Chandra Singh Dudhoria and ors. Vs. the Midnapore Zemindary Co. Ltd.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1951Cal300

..... and that is appealable 11 it appears to me that the word judgment must be differentiated from the words decree and final order if what is sought to be appealed from .....

M. Ranganatham Pillai, L.R. of the Deceased Vaduvambal Ammal Vs. T. Go ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1950)2MLJ280

..... as here but against his legal representative that in my opinion is a mode of differentiation based on an accident of fact and not on an essential of legal principle and .....

M.R. Venkataraman Vs. Commissioner of Police and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1951Mad1015

..... explain the matter still further any law in clause 2 of article 372 must be differentiated from an enactment a legislature may pass an enactment which may be beyond its powers .....

Palaniappa Goundan Vs. Nallappa Goundan and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1951Mad817; (1951)IMLJ265

..... a minor s property by his legal guardian 5 article 44 limitation act does not differentiate between guardians wards belonging to different communities it does not lay down any special rule .....