Differentiator - Judgment Search Results

N. Kt. Sivalingam Chettiar Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1967]66ITR586(SC)

..... has no application in india section 3 appreciation of evidence discrepancies held court has to differentiate between normal and material discrepancies while normal discrepancies do not corrode credibility of a partys .....

The Union of India, Represented by the General Manager, North-eastern ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1968SC22; [1967]3SCR219

..... citizens the guarantee of equal protection clause of the constitution does not extend to any differential treatment which may result in the application of a special rule of interpretation between the .....

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Joint Commercial Tax Officer a ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1967)2MLJ552

..... our minds quite discriminatory and considerably affects the freedom of trade commerce and intercourse the differential rates or exemptions in various states have an unequal burden on some or similar goods ..... and circumstances necessary for free flow of trade or commerce from one state to another differential rates or exemptions obtaining in the several states being automatically applied by virtue of .....

Utah Pie Co. Vs. Continental Baking Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... meaning of 2 a the court concluded that pet s price differential to safeway was cost justified and that pet s page 386 ..... cost the court of appeals first concluded that pet s price differential on sales to safeway must be put aside in considering injury ..... to competition because in its view of the evidence the differential had been completely cost justified and because utah would not in .....

Premchand Jechand Vs. K.G. Sanghrani, Assistant Director and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1968)9GLR777

..... fine while the buyer can with impunity disregard an order of compulsory sale but every differentiation does not necessarily amount to discrimination violative of the equal protection clause the stockholder and ..... the buyer are not similarly situated and the differentiation made between them in the matter of treatment under clause 14a has a rational .....

Chandra Bhavan (Boarding and Lodging), Bangalore and ors. Vs. State of ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (1969)ILLJ97Kant; (1968)1MysLJ24

..... apprentices though at one stage the learned special government pleader tried to justify non differentiation between adults adolescents and children in the impugned notification he later submitted that the ..... workers at first the learned special government pleader sought to justify the absence of differentiation in the impugned notification between apprentices and other workmen on the ground that if .....

Chandrabhava Boarding and Loading and ors. Vs. State of Mysore by Its ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1968Kant156; AIR1968Mys156

..... apprentices 136 though at one stage the learned special government pleader tried to justify non differentiation between adults adolescents and children in the impugned notification he later submitted that the ..... 140 at first the learned special government pleader sought to justify the absence of differentiation in the impugned notification between apprentices and other workmen on the ground that if .....

The Catholic Bank of India Ltd., (In Liquidation) Vs. George Jacob

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1968Ker3

..... the poorer sections of the state this also will provide a rational basis for a differential treatment of such debts19 it has also to be remembered that banking institutions lend other ..... a class by themselves that there is a rational basis for the differential treatment impugned before us and that the differential treatment is consistent with the subject and the purpose of the .....

Ftc Vs. Universal-rundle Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... conditions in this industry if respondent is not permitted to sell plumbing fixtures with a differential in price as are its competitors on truckload and less than truckload quantities respondent ..... than truckload quantities is able to avail itself of the truckload discount and whether the differential is sufficient in the competitive conditions shown to exist to have the requisite anticompetitive .....

Chicago and N.W. R. Co. Vs. A., T and S.F. R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... constituted unfair procedural surprise that the statute does not permit the commission to differentiate railroads performance as freight carriers and passenger carriers when it assesses revenue needs ..... equalizing competing routes in dealing with this contention two considerations must be sharply differentiated the first is the general desirability of equalizing divisions the mountain pacific lines .....