Differentiator - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: differentiator Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 133 results (0.006 seconds)State of Bihar Vs. Bishnu Chand Lal Chaudhary and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-08-1985
Reported in: AIR1985SC285; 1985(33)BLJR96; 1985(1)SCALE1; (1985)1SCC449; [1985]2SCR527; 1985(17)LC479(SC)
..... 1 to be a valid classification it must not only be founded on an intelligible differential which distinguishes persons and things that are grouped together from others left out of the ..... 11 4 a and not under s 11a 1 683 c b the classification and differential treatment of registered and unregistered dealers are based on substantial difference having a reasonable relation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTindrajit Barua and ors. Vs. Election Commission of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-30-1985
Reported in: AIR1986SC103; 1985(2)SCALE678; (1985)4SCC722; [1985]Supp3SCR225
..... has no application in india section 3 appreciation of evidence discrepancies held court has to differentiate between normal and material discrepancies while normal discrepancies do not corrode credibility of a partys .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of U.P. and anr. Vs. Raja Ram Jaiswal and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-29-1985
Reported in: AIR1985SC1108; 1985(1)SCALE1248; (1985)3SCC131; [1985]3SCR1021
..... citizens the guarantee of equal protection clause of the constitution does not extend to any differential treatment which may result in the application of a special rule of interpretation between the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Government Employees' Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. Vs. Stat ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jun-04-1985
Reported in: ILR1986KAR2425; 1985(2)KarLJ300
..... validity of the provision it is not a provision for creating any additional tax liability differential treatment having regard to the differently situated persons is not one resulting in discrimination alternative .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMysore Plywoods Ltd., Bangalore Vs. Assistant Collector of Central Exc ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-01-1985
Reported in: 1985(5)ECC76; 1985(20)ELT267(Kar)
..... doors manufactured by assessee and item no 68 was applicable assessee entitled to refund of differential duty between duty payable under item no 68 and item no 16b assessee entitled for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaryana Roller Flour Mills Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-20-1985
Reported in: AIR1986P& H182
..... action of the authorities requiring them either to deposit the differential amount between the old prices and the revised prices of ..... jurisdiction under any law requiring the petitioners to deposit the differential amount due to the increase in the issue price of ..... any direction requiring the roller flour mills to pay the differential amount no doubt the licencing authorities have power under clause .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMetropolitan Life Ins. Co. Vs. Ward
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-26-1985
..... ohio oklahoma oregon south dakota tennessee texas washington and wisconsin all incorporated tax differentials favoring domestic insurers see app 377 379 any doubt that congress intent encompassed ..... bear a rational relationship to a legitimate state purpose benjamin clearly recognized that differentially taxing foreign insurers to promote a local insurance industry was a legitimate state .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKutir Diyasalai Udyog (U.S.S.) Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-04-1985
Reported in: (1986)(6)LC396Tri(Delhi)
..... he first contended that in terms of the notification abovementioned the differential duty could have been demanded on the entire clearances from ..... during the year had exceeded 75 million matches only the differential duty could be demanded only on the excess over the ..... 1979 that the department would have become entitled to demand differential duty for all clearances commencing from 1 4 1979 9 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise Vs. Amber Paints
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-11-1985
Reported in: (1985)(22)ELT297TriDel
..... department issued a show cause notice to amber paints demanding the differential duty of rs 18 554 25 the deputy collector of ..... confirmed by the assistant collector was set aside except for the differential duty leviable on the toluene contained in 400 litres of ..... in this background the question of demanding any sum representing the differential duty on the toluene received by amber paints could not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.C. Vasanth Kumar and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-08-1985
Reported in: AIR1985SC1495; 1985(1)SCALE832; 1985Supp(1)SCC714; [1985]Supp1SCR352
..... called caste organisation is substantially different from the traditional structure and caste councils economic differentiation amongst the members of the caste has become sharp but not so sharp as ..... of grievance have arisen at different times for particular historical reasons often tending to differentiate among the categories of equality rather than unifying them inequalities of class race religion .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial