Differentiator - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: differentiator Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 379 results (0.006 seconds)Fenoplast Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jul-24-1998
Reported in: (1998)(62)ECC730
..... earlier relating to the question of reclassification of goods only and making no demand for differential duty for past period demand issued straightaway subsequently not regardable as being in continuation ..... date when the order in original concerned was passed no amount payment was paid as differential excise duty and therefore the department should have demanded thereafter the quantified demand in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTi.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-04-1998
Reported in: (1998)(62)ECC591
..... corrigendum notice the show cause notice did not furnish the basis for the demand of differential duty apart from referring to various documents and furnishing copies of various documents the basis ..... notice refers to annexure c to the show cause notice as containing the calculation of differential duty the corrigendum notice was accompanied by a chart showing effective prices this chart is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH.C.L. Hp Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-1998
Reported in: (1999)(112)ELT604TriDel
..... clearly time barred however this aspect is not relevant as the differential duty has not been demanded by invoking the extended time limit ..... has been continuing and the department changes it at some stage differential duty has to be demanded in respect of past clearances ..... seizure and confiscation section 28 cannot be ignored for recovery of differential duty section 125 in our view will apply in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSrichakra Tyres Ltd. and anr. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Sep-08-1998
Reported in: (1999)(83)LC690Tri(Chennai)
..... duty then again he would have passed on the burden of differential duties to its customers thus resulting in higher sale realisation ..... department on two occasions and that they had not paid the differential duty arising out of such revisions they had however contended ..... excise duty evaded had to be calculated with reference to the differential value charged over and above the declared price 14 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohan Breweries and Distilleries Vs. Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Aug-05-1998
Reported in: (2003)133STC163Tribunal
..... was completed on april 22 1992 the petitioners received the differential price as ordered by the government on july 29 1992 ..... act on or before march 31 1992 along with the differential tax the petitioners objected to the imposition of penalty questioning ..... filed by the respondent contending that the petitioners had received the differential price on march 13 1992 therefore they should have included .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhageria Marbles Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-09-1998
Reported in: (1999)(107)ELT434TriDel
..... m s bhagaria marbles the matter relates to the demand of differential central excise duty calculated on the basis of the private ..... the exercise books recovered belonged to their contractors and that the differential was on account of breakages the broken pieces known as ..... were eligible for their wages it has resulted into the differential he referred to the statement of shri naval kishore bhageria .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVegetable VitamIn Foods Co. Ltd. Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-22-1998
Reported in: (1999)(80)LC172Tri(Mum.)bai
..... and confined his submission to the ground of limitation and the errors in quantification of differential duty as also the imposition of penalty learned counsel for the appellant contended that ..... and the case is remanded to the jurisdictional adjudicating authority for quantifying the amount of differential duty correctly in accordance with the findings and directions contained in this order and for .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRasa Constructions, Engineers and Contractors, Karimnagar Vs. Executio ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-23-1998
Reported in: 1998(5)ALD106
..... writ petition the respondents issued proceedings dated 16 11 1997 directing the petitioner to remit differential amount after adjusting the above amounts consequently the petitioner filed an application for amendment ..... the impugned proceedings dated 16 11 1997 calling upon the petitioner to pay the differential amount is absolutely illegal and wholly without jurisdiction it may be open for the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOm Shiv Shakti Cement (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-01-1998
Reported in: (1998)(61)ECC217
..... the appellant taking into account this amount the collector had demanded the differential amount of rs 17 635 and imposed penalty of rs 15 000 ..... of duty may not have come to light the payment of the differential duty by the appellant is a case of virtue out of necessity ..... the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the differential duty involved was rs 24 000 we find that the penalty of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPolar Appliances Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-05-1998
Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT249TriDel
..... a strong prima facie case so far as the payments of the differential duty of the aforesaid amount is concerned penalty of rs 58 65 ..... to the waiver of duty to the extent of the amount of differential duty on parts covered by notification no 50 95 this calculation has ..... to be done by the authorities below 6 in case no differential duty is required to be paid in terms of the aforesaid directions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial