Differentiator - Year 1990 - Judgments

Mar 23 1990 (SC)

Kishan Lal Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-23-1990

Reported in: AIR1990SC2269; [1990]183ITR433(SC); JT1990(1)SC550; [1990]2SCR142; 1990(1)LC625(SC); 1990(1)WLN168

..... legislation is undertaken this must be based on some reasonable distinction between the cases differentially treated when differential treatment is not reasonably explained and justified the treatment is discriminatory if different subjects .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 1990 (SC)

M/S. Hindustan Polymers Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-23-1990

Reported in: AIR1990SC1676; 1989(24)ECC380; 1989(43)ELT165(SC); JT1989(3)SC674; 1989(2)SCALE411; (1989)4SCC323; (1989)4SCC323a; [1989]3SCR974

..... 1 to be a valid classification it must not only be founded on an intelligible differential which distinguishes persons and things that are grouped together from others left out of the ..... 11 4 a and not under s 11a 1 683 c b the classification and differential treatment of registered and unregistered dealers are based on substantial difference having a reasonable relation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 1990 (SC)

Era Sezhiyan Vs. T.R. Balu and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-01-1990

Reported in: AIR1990SC838; JT1990(1)SC392; 1990(1)SCALE377; 1990Supp(1)SCC322; [1990]1SCR767

..... the same manner as notifications issued after that date art 14 does not strike at differentiation caused by the enactment of a law between transactions governed thereby and those which are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 20 1990 (HC)

Kalaiah @ Kalegowda Vs. Lingamma

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-20-1990

Reported in: ILR1991KAR1213; 1990(3)KarLJ571

..... validity of the provision it is not a provision for creating any additional tax liability differential treatment having regard to the differently situated persons is not one resulting in discrimination alternative .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 1990 (HC)

1. State of Maharashtra 2. First Income-tax Officer Vs. Narayan Champa ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-03-1990

Reported in: [1993]201ITR315(Bom)

..... teacher unfortunately is not covered by the said scheme and therefore not entitled retirement benefit differentiation between full time teachers and part time lecturers government resolution providing for retrial benefits to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 18 1990 (HC)

K. R. Venkitaperumal Raja Vs. Commissioner of Agricultural Income-tax ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-18-1990

Reported in: [1992]193ITR213(Bom)

..... teacher unfortunately is not covered by the said scheme and therefore not entitled retirement benefit differentiation between full time teachers and part time lecturers government resolution providing for retrial benefits to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 12 1990 (HC)

Oceanic Contractors Inc. Vs. Income-tax Officer.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-12-1990

Reported in: (1990)36TTJ(Mumbai)640

..... teacher unfortunately is not covered by the said scheme and therefore not entitled retirement benefit differentiation between full time teachers and part time lecturers government resolution providing for retrial benefits to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 1990 (HC)

J. Vs. Gokal and Co. and anr. V. G. R. Pewekar, Inspecting Assistant C ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-30-1990

Reported in: (1992)107CTR(Bom)180

..... teacher unfortunately is not covered by the said scheme and therefore not entitled retirement benefit differentiation between full time teachers and part time lecturers government resolution providing for retrial benefits to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 07 1990 (HC)

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Smt. Bhagwati Pratap Bhogilal and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-07-1990

Reported in: (1992)107CTR(Bom)173

..... teacher unfortunately is not covered by the said scheme and therefore not entitled retirement benefit differentiation between full time teachers and part time lecturers government resolution providing for retrial benefits to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 1990 (HC)

Sargeras Unkar Jadhav Vs. Gurindar Singh and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-16-1990

Reported in: I(1991)ACC270

..... teacher unfortunately is not covered by the said scheme and therefore not entitled retirement benefit differentiation between full time teachers and part time lecturers government resolution providing for retrial benefits to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Differentiator - Judgment Search Results