Differentiator - Year 1996 - Judgments

Dec 31 1996 (SC)

Jaffar HussaIn Ebrahim and Another Vs. M/S. Taiyabali Dawoodji Rangwal ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-31-1996

Reported in: AIR1997SC1757; JT1997(1)SC307; 1996(9)SCALE710; (1997)9SCC92

..... legislation is undertaken this must be based on some reasonable distinction between the cases differentially treated when differential treatment is not reasonably explained and justified the treatment is discriminatory if different subjects .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 25 1996 (SC)

State of U.P. and Another Vs. Rajendra Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-25-1996

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)1023; AIR1996SC1564; JT1996(2)SC112; 1996(4)KarLJ498; 1996(1)SCALE814; (1996)7SCC347; [1996]1SCR984

..... legislation is undertaken this must be based on some reasonable distinction between the cases differentially treated when differential treatment is not reasonably explained and justified the treatment is discriminatory if different subjects .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 1996 (SC)

Puran Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-18-1996

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)639; AIR1996SC1092; JT1996(1)SC362; 1996(4)KarLJ47; (1996)113PLR700; 1996(1)SCALE380; (1996)2SCC205; [1996]1SCR730; 1996(1)LC241(SC)

..... 1 to be a valid classification it must not only be founded on an intelligible differential which distinguishes persons and things that are grouped together from others left out of the ..... 11 4 a and not under s 11a 1 683 c b the classification and differential treatment of registered and unregistered dealers are based on substantial difference having a reasonable relation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 1996 (SC)

Orissa State Financial Corporation and anr. Vs. Hotel Jogendra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-18-1996

Reported in: 1996VAD(SC)92; [1996]86CompCas722(SC); JT1996(5)SC322; 1996(4)SCALE407; (1996)5SCC357; [1996]Supp1SCR571; 1996(2)LC285(SC)

..... an established fact that both were similarly situated thereafter nothing happened which may justify the differential treatment thus the corporation cannot put forth financial loss as a ground only with regard .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 1996 (SC)

Divisional Level Committee and anr. Vs. Sahu Stone Crushing Industries

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-21-1996

Reported in: (1998)8SCC435; [1999]114STC362(SC)

..... capital gains cost of acquisition of asset and additional compensation under land acquisition act 1894 differential treatment under i t act 1961 held compensation originally awarded cost of acquisition of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 08 1996 (SC)

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Jaipur Vs. Naraini Udyog and ors ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jul-08-1996

Reported in: 1996VAD(SC)730; [1997(75)FLR480]; JT1997(10)SC476; (1996)IILLJ163SC; 1996(5)SCALE500; (1996)5SCC522; [1996]Supp3SCR202; 1996(2)LC518(SC)

..... capital gains cost of acquisition of asset and additional compensation under land acquisition act 1894 differential treatment under i t act 1961 held compensation originally awarded cost of acquisition of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 10 1996 (SC)

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Jaora Sugar Mills Ltd., and Others Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-10-1996

Reported in: 1996VIIIAD(SC)554; AIR1997SC600; 1996(8)SCALE88; (1997)9SCC207; [1996]Supp7SCR411

..... the same manner as notifications issued after that date art 14 does not strike at differentiation caused by the enactment of a law between transactions governed thereby and those which are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 11 1996 (SC)

State of Uttar Pradesh Vs. District Judge and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-11-1996

Reported in: 1996VIIIAD(SC)68; AIR1997SC53; JT1996(9)SC401; 1996(7)SCALE671; (1997)1SCC496; [1996]Supp7SCR513

..... citizens the guarantee of equal protection clause of the constitution does not extend to any differential treatment which may result in the application of a special rule of interpretation between the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 1996 (HC)

Eshwarawwa Vs. Amarappa

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-10-1996

Reported in: ILR1997KAR911; 1997(2)KarLJ95

..... validity of the provision it is not a provision for creating any additional tax liability differential treatment having regard to the differently situated persons is not one resulting in discrimination alternative .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 05 1996 (HC)

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Savitribai Tukaram Londhe and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-05-1996

Reported in: I(1997)ACC370

..... teacher unfortunately is not covered by the said scheme and therefore not entitled retirement benefit differentiation between full time teachers and part time lecturers government resolution providing for retrial benefits to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Differentiator - Judgment Search Results