Differentiator - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: differentiator Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 223 results (0.007 seconds)Mathunni Mathai Vs. Hindustan Organic Chemicals Limited and Another
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-25-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC1572; I(1996)BC134(SC); JT1995(4)SC233; (1995)2MLJ59(SC); (1995)111PLR596; 1995(3)SCALE159; (1995)4SCC26; [1995]3SCR765
..... 1 to be a valid classification it must not only be founded on an intelligible differential which distinguishes persons and things that are grouped together from others left out of the ..... 11 4 a and not under s 11a 1 683 c b the classification and differential treatment of registered and unregistered dealers are based on substantial difference having a reasonable relation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDaulat Ram Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-14-1995
Reported in: AIR1995SC1998; 1995CriLJ3648; 1995(2)SCALE75; (1996)11SCC711
..... legislation is undertaken this must be based on some reasonable distinction between the cases differentially treated when differential treatment is not reasonably explained and justified the treatment is discriminatory if different subjects .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner, Salem Municipality Vs. T. Kuralmani and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-30-1995
Reported in: JT1995(8)SC53; 1995(6)SCALE217; 1995Supp(4)SCC105; [1995]Supp4SCR563
..... an established fact that both were similarly situated thereafter nothing happened which may justify the differential treatment thus the corporation cannot put forth financial loss as a ground only with regard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSant Saran Goswami Alias Deoji Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-17-1995
Reported in: 1995(43)BLJR1084; 1995(1)SCALE312; (1995)2SCC366; [1995]1SCR344; 1995(1)LC673(SC)
..... an established fact that both were similarly situated thereafter nothing happened which may justify the differential treatment thus the corporation cannot put forth financial loss as a ground only with regard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.D.A. Vs. Bhavana Coop. G.H. Society Ltd.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-24-1995
Reported in: 1995(5)SCALE162; 1995Supp(4)SCC99; [1995]Supp3SCR56
..... an established fact that both were similarly situated thereafter nothing happened which may justify the differential treatment thus the corporation cannot put forth financial loss as a ground only with regard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJangli and ors. Vs. Bhagwati (Smt) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-12-1995
Reported in: JT1995(6)SC679; 1995(5)SCALE469; (1995)6SCC140; [1995]Supp3SCR578
..... an established fact that both were similarly situated thereafter nothing happened which may justify the differential treatment thus the corporation cannot put forth financial loss as a ground only with regard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. Gopal Oil Mills and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-23-1995
Reported in: [1999]115STC25(SC)
..... an established fact that both were similarly situated thereafter nothing happened which may justify the differential treatment thus the corporation cannot put forth financial loss as a ground only with regard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Punjab and anr. Vs. Satinder Bir Singh
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-22-1995
Reported in: JT1995(2)SC572; (1995)110PLR696; 1995(2)SCALE97; (1995)3SCC330; [1995]2SCR255
..... an established fact that both were similarly situated thereafter nothing happened which may justify the differential treatment thus the corporation cannot put forth financial loss as a ground only with regard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLabhu Ram and ors. Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-26-1995
Reported in: 1996(1)ALD(Cri)731; 1996CriLJ399; 1995(4)Crimes139(SC); JT1995(7)SC98; 1995(5)SCALE568; 1995Supp(4)SCC17
..... an established fact that both were similarly situated thereafter nothing happened which may justify the differential treatment thus the corporation cannot put forth financial loss as a ground only with regard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise, Baroda Vs. Surat Cotton Spinning and Weav ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-17-1995
Reported in: 1997(92)ELT313(SC); (1996)7SCC264
..... an established fact that both were similarly situated thereafter nothing happened which may justify the differential treatment thus the corporation cannot put forth financial loss as a ground only with regard .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial