Skip to content

Did you mean: differential?


Differentiator - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: differentiator Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 629 results (0.009 seconds)
Sep 15 2005 (TRI)

AshwIn S. Mehta Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Sep-15-2005

..... set up by vora to import bearings and bearing housings grossly undervaluing them that the differential duty is demandable from vora and the grossly undervalued bearings and bearing housings were ..... his premises granting without admitting that the documents relied upon by the department prove undervaluation differential duty if any should be demanded from the importers and not from the alleged .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 07 2005 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Seil Ltd. (Unit Mawana Sugar Works) ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-07-2005

Reported in: 127(2006)DLT611; 2006(86)DRJ456

..... 16 20 barakhamba lane new delhi 110001 subject reimbursement of differential ex factory price for levy sugar delivered out of 1993 ..... are thereforee advised to submit their claims for reimbursements of differential ex factory levy price directly to the food corporation of ..... same formats earlier prescribed in this connection for reimbursement of differential ex factory levy price for the last season in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 28 2005 (TRI)

Gaurang Goradia Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-28-2005

..... however the goods are not available for confiscation 7 i confirm differential duty amounting to rs 3 49 970 under section 28 1 ..... however the said goods are not available for confiscation 12 i confirm differential duty amounting to rs 2 39 400 on the goods imported ..... however the goods are not available for confiscation 21 i confirm differential duty amounting to rs 30 900 on the goods imported by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 07 2005 (TRI)

Commr. of Cus. and C. Ex. (A) Vs. Kovvur Co-op. Sugar Factory Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Nov-07-2005

..... letter dt 28 10 98 subsequently the government of india paid differential price to the appellants without adjusting the same in the ..... no dispute about the duty involved the assessee has paid the differential duty also the appellants have filed this appeal requesting the appellate ..... payment of duty the duty was paid as soon as the differential price was paid to the appellants by the government the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 2005 (TRI)

Amarsri Engineering Company Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Nov-28-2005

..... appellants appear to have indulged some undesirable activities like raising fake invoices etc but demanding differential duty and denying modvat credit on the same goods on the ground that they have ..... the view that the order in original is not sustainable the appellants had already paid differential duty demanded in the absence of clearcut evidence the charge of modvat credit was utilised .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 30 2005 (FN)

Smith Vs. City of Jackson

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-30-2005

..... language that significantly narrows its coverage by permitting any otherwise prohibited action where the differentiation is based on reasonable factors other than age hereinafter rfoa provision iii in ..... such arbitrary i e intentional and unfounded discrimination from two other phenomena one involves differentiation of employees based on a genuine relationship between age and ability to perform .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 01 2005 (SC)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Belgaum Vs. Akay Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-01-2005

Reported in: AIR2005SC4020; 2005(99)ECC762; 2005(182)ELT294(SC); JT2005(11)SC239; (2005)3SCC764

..... matter back to the commissioner appeals to re examine the demand for differential duty for the period from 4 91 to 3 93 this ..... matter back to the commissioner appeals for reconsideration of the demand for differential duty in respect of the period 4 91 to 3 93 ..... the circumstances the tribunal was right in setting aside the demand for differential duty amounting to rs 1 59 606 22 for the said period .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 07 2005 (HC)

Vijay Singh Son of Sri Ganga Ram Singh and Shailendra Pratap Awasthi S ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-07-2005

Reported in: 2006(2)AWC1367

..... on an intelligible criterion which has a rational nexus with the object of differentiation such differentiation will not amount to discrimination 14 in m p rural agriculture extension officers ..... performing similar work had separate responsibilities or educational qualifications but merely by making a differentiation on the ground that persons appointed prior to a particular date would be given .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 2005 (FN)

Granholm Vs. Heald

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-16-2005

..... state but not out of state wineries to make direct sales to consumers this differential treatment explicitly discriminates against interstate commerce by limiting the emerging and significant direct sale ..... state wineries by contrast can obtain a license for direct sales to consumers the differential treatment between in state and out of state wineries constitutes explicit discrimination against .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2005 (HC)

Ceat Tyres of India Ltd. Vs. Nashik Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-23-2005

Reported in: 2005(2)ALLMR466

..... which difference in octroi duty can be recovered according to them respondents cannot recover the differential duty additionally they contended that the decision goes contrary to the earlier resolution of the ..... the challenge to the action of the respondents in calling upon the petitioners to pay differential octroi duty at the rate specified in the communication letter demand notice dated 15th .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //