Skip to content


Classifier - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: classifier Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 733 results (0.011 seconds)
Feb 21 2012 (TRI)

K.P. Abdulkhader Vs. the Administrator, Union Territory of Lakshadweep ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on: Feb-21-2012

..... with those employees having graduation and b lib degree or to be treated as graduate classifier and assistant librarian working in the department who fulfilled the educational and other qualifications ..... post of cataloguer also 12 counsel for the applicant also submitted that be it classifier or cataloguer posts for appointment by promotion the educational qualifications as for direct recruitment are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 03 2012 (HC)

Ambattur Zone Residents Welfare Association, Rep. by Its President Mel ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-03-2012

..... that the lands situated in ambattur tank bed had been specifically classified as tank bed in the lsquo a rsquo register maintained ..... according to the writ petitioner t i cycles encroached the lands classified as tank bed and hence the transaction is per se illegal ..... of the writ petitioner association that the lands have been re classified only for the purpose of benefitting 21st respondent is without .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 2012 (HC)

M/S. Hotel Waman and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-02-2012

..... and no substantial change has been made in the faade hotels which have been classified re classified under heritage categories prior to issue of these guidelines will continue under heritage categories ..... under three star category the designated authority had recommended that the applicant hotel be classified as two star hotel after inspecting the hotel premises and the facilities available therein .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 04 2012 (HC)

Ricoh India Limited Vs. Commissioner

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-04-2012

..... incorporating or working in conjunction with an automatic data processing machine are to be classified in the heading appropriate to their respective functions or failing that in residual heading ..... data processing machines and performing a specific function other than data processing are to be classified in the heading appropriate to their respective functions or failing that in residual headings .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 12 2012 (TRI)

Reliance Communications Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Customs (A ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-12-2012

..... instruments and only parts of entire wireless telephony system the said goods were not classifiable under cth 85171210 parts of telephone including cellular networks transmission and reception apparatus are ..... covered under cth 85177090 therefore the imported goods were correctly classifiable under cth 85177090 and not 85171210 as claimed by the importer 5 thereafter show .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 01 2012 (TRI)

ispat Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-01-2012

..... under heading no 2712 10 and the adjudicating authority hold that the appellants have correctly classified the goods under heading 2710 00 as the revenue was not satisfied with that order ..... considering the submission of the appellant the adjudicating authority itself held that the goods are classifiable under heading 2710 00 the department has challenged that order before the commissioner appeals any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 2012 (TRI)

Sumangala Steels Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Ch ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

Decided on: Mar-02-2012

03 2010 page 363 of common paperbook has stated that classification of the samples into alloy and non alloy steel is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 12 2012 (TRI)

M/S Hindustan Gum and Chemicals Ltd and Another Vs. Cce, Ahmedabad

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-12-2012

..... later the department conducted some investigation and it appeared to them that the product is classifiable under tariff heading 13 01 and excise duty is payable on such product accordingly show ..... the case of hindustan gum and chemicals ltd bhiwani the assessee paid duty under protest classifying the product under heading 13 01 nbsp nbsp the adjudicating officer finalised classification under heading .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 12 2012 (HC)

Ms. N.A.K.G. Cotfibres Private Vs. the Zonal Manager

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-12-2012

..... the above said financial assistance credit facilities have become irregular and the debt has been classified as non performing asset in accordance with the directives guidelines relating to asset classification ..... irregular under those circumstances it cannot be said that the respondents are not right in classifying the loan account of the petitioner as non performing asset 12 the main contention .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 06 2012 (HC)

Mamta Dinesh Vakil Vs. Bansi S. Wadhwa

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-06-2012

..... minority and guardianship law under the hindu minority and guardianship act 1956 hama it classified guardians in three classes 1 natural guardians 2 testamentary guardians 3 guardians appointed under ..... the judgment it was observed that the constitution does not posit totally unguided non classified equality however laws only solve specific problems and achieve definite objectives and absolute equality .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //