Skip to content


Classifier - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: classifier Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 958 results (0.015 seconds)
Apr 21 1998 (TRI)

Srf Limited and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-21-1998

Reported in: (1998)(61)ECC687

..... item 19 and hence industrial fabrics like pvc coated belting fabrics would be correctly classifiable under tariff item 68 extensive technical materials relied upon in multiple fabrics decision were ..... 2 a any goods unfinished semi finished incomplete not complete disassembled unassembled will be classified under the heading appropriate on the goods when complete finished or assembled hence the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 13 1998 (TRI)

Tetragon Chemie (P) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Cce and ors.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-13-1998

Reported in: (1999)(63)ECC709

..... edition feeding stuffs have been defined as feeding stuffs for dairy cattle may be broadly classified in roughages and concentrates the roughages consist of succulent feeds natural grazing cultivated grazes ..... heading 29 36 and accordingly products of the type referred to above are correctly classified under chapter heading 29 36 this clarification further brings out clearly that such preparations .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 1998 (TRI)

Cinerama Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-13-1998

Reported in: (1999)(114)ELT313TriDel

..... been described that the objective lenses for cameras projectors or photographic enlargers or reducers were classifiable under sub heading no 9002 11 10 the appellants also argued that the projection ..... use solely or principally with the machines appliances instruments or apparatus of chapter 90 were classifiable with those machines appliances etc this general rule was not applicable when any goods .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 07 1998 (TRI)

Ahmed Oomerbhoy Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-07-1998

Reported in: (1998)(102)ELT577TriDel

..... classification under tariff item 68 though the respondent resisted the notice the assistant collector classified acid oil under tariff item 68 the collector appeals following kusum products limited 1985 ..... pointer to such acid oils being different from the vegetable oils themselves which were classified under other headings since the need for such specific and separate classification for acid .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 20 1998 (TRI)

Eacom'S Controls (India) Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-20-1998

Reported in: (1999)(81)LC25Tri(Delhi)

..... automatically controlled instruments of apparatus starting stopping or operating devices are generally to be classified in heading 85 36 switches relays etc observing the catalogue the assistant collector ..... rectifiers inverters alternating current converters and cycle converters and direct current converters are classifiable under chapter 85 04 of the customs tariff as per explanatory notes given .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 1998 (TRI)

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-17-1998

Reported in: (1998)(76)LC77Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the revenue 13 the learned senior advocate submitted that the goods in question cannot he classified as chassis fitted with engines for motors and other vehicles principally designed for transportation of ..... carried out from time to time and does not uniquely distinguish the vehicle for being classified as passenger version only the report of victoria jubilee technical institute at page 177 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 1998 (TRI)

Gulshan Sugar and Chemicals Works Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-10-1998

Reported in: (1999)(63)ECC472

..... act 1985 covers carbonates the product in dispute which is precipitated calcium carbonate is correctly classifiable under this heading sub heading 2836 90 un coated variety and the coated variety is ..... member on the following point whether coated variety of precipitated calcium carbonate precipitated chalk was classifiable under 3823 00 or 2836 90 1 the issue for consideration in his difference of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 16 1998 (HC)

The Goa Foundation and Another Vs. the Conservator of Forests and Othe ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-16-1998

Reported in: 1999(2)BomCR695

..... without prior permission from the central government she also pointed out that the lands were classified previously under various categories but there was no classification in respect of private forests which ..... this court and submitted that they did not take into consideration the relevant criteria for classifying forest but on the contrary took into account irrelevant factors for coming to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 1998 (TRI)

Bakul Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-10-1998

Reported in: (1999)(63)ECC485

..... to 1 3 86 and for the period subsequent thereto they had intentionally misdeclared mis classified this product as pesticides insecticides under sub heading 3808 10 of the central excises tariff ..... 3 herbicides 4 weedicides and 5 pesticides were specified other than these specified product were classifiable under sub heading no 3808 90 the plant growth regulators were specifically mentioned in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 1998 (TRI)

Lathia Rubber Mfg. Co. P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-04-1998

Reported in: (1999)(106)ELT278TriDel

..... further he has observed that the goods chlorosulphonated polyethylene have been specifically directed to be classified in chapter 39 as per explanatory notes of hsn page 557 8 the collector appeals ..... above position i hold that the product is not a synthetic rubber but chlorosulphonated polyethylene classifiable under chapter heading 39 01 viewed in the light of the statutory definition hon ble .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //