Classifier - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: classifier Year: 1994 Page 1 of about 561 results (0.012 seconds)Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-02-1994
Reported in: (1994)(72)ELT197TriDel
..... the original show cause notice issued by the assistant collector to the appellants was for classifying these two products under heading 30 03 as medicaments for animals the assistant collector having ..... been satisfied that the products would not come under chapter 30 classified them under heading 23 02 as originally claimed by the appellants the collector of central .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.C.W. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-16-1994
Reported in: (1994)(73)ELT107TriDel
..... machine under one heading even though each of the machine are separately invoiced and classifiable under different headings attracting higher rates of duty since the value for import contol ..... sealing is subsidiary therefore on the basis of principal function the star feeders can be classified as handling loading and unloading machinery and the most appropriate classification therefore for this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTwenty First Century Printers Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-29-1994
Reported in: (1995)LC117Tri(Delhi)
..... and composite machines section note 3 provides that in general multi function machines are classified according to the principal function of the machines and in case of composite machines ..... to form a whole consecutively or simultaneously performing separate functions which are generally complementary are classified according to the main purpose of main function of composite machine e g printing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMetal Forgings (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-29-1994
Reported in: (1994)(73)ELT302TriDel
..... by member technical also it follows that only precision machining would render forged products as classifiable under tariff item 68 he contended that under these circumstances as held by member ..... finally produced had arrived at the following conclusion in view of the above discussions i classify the products manufactured by the party namely flange rings discs connecting rods pinions shafting gears .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTForbes Gokak Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-11-1994
Reported in: (1995)(80)ELT801TriDel
..... products captively for the manufacture of opthalmic blanks lenses and that these glass moulds were classifiable under central excise tariff chapter heading 70 15 and that the appellant had claimed ..... process of manufacture this view is further supported by the fact that opthalmic blanks are classified under central excise tariff chapter heading 90 whereas neither party has claimed the classification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat Steel Tubes Industries Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Feb-04-1994
Reported in: (1994)(71)ELT756TriDel
..... are parts of machinery falling under chapter 84 and which are classifiable under heading 98 06 are eligible to the benefit of ..... under notification 69 87 on the ground that such parts were classifiable under chapter 82 and were therefore excluded from the benefit ..... particular machine s and parts of such tools will also be classifiable under this chapter unless they are expressly included under any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMilk Food Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-02-1994
Reported in: (1994)LC98Tri(Delhi)
..... ancillary apparatus essential to the application of low temperature produced in such installation are classified under heading 84 18 provided they are presented together with other components of these ..... apparatus essential to the application of the low temperature produced in such installations are classified in this heading provided they are presented together with the other components of these .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of C. Ex. Vs. Sukhjit Starch and Chemicals Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-1994
Reported in: (1994)(72)ELT753TriDel
..... less than 80 expressed as anhydrous dextrose so the liquid glucose malto dextrin are correctly classifiable under heading sub heading 17 02 1702 29 shri sorabjee the learned senior advocate argued ..... less than 80 expressed as anhydrous dextrose so the liquid glucose malto dextrin are correctly classifiable under heading subheading 17 02 1702 29 mrs sundaram the learned sdr has heavily relied .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishna International Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-07-1994
Reported in: (1994)LC76Tri(Delhi)
..... tape and so the same yardstick should be applied while classifying the audio cassette housing and parts thereof and video cassette ..... tape therefore the magnetic housing made of plastic would be classifiable under chapter 39 as articles of plastics and thus exempt ..... and principally with a particular kind of machine are to be classified with that particular kind of machine he submitted that the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkwell Engineering Co. Vs. Collector of C. Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-15-1994
Reported in: (1994)(72)ELT222TriDel
..... manufactured by them is an electro mechanical domestic appliance with self contained electric motor grinder classifiable under the said sub heading therefore they were called upon to explain as to ..... not sustainable 4 assistant collector rejected their contention and held that although the product was classifiable under heading 8437 00 but it does not bar the department to modify the classification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial