Classifier - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: classifier Year: 1990 Page 1 of about 494 results (0.01 seconds)Calcutta Steel Industries Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-1990
Reported in: (1991)(54)ELT90TriDel
..... were further modified and thereby the classification of the products became a controversial issue in classifying the products as bar strip or hoop by the departmental officers the tribunal in its ..... statutory definitions will not take their products out of the categories already held to be classifiable one important criteria in these definitions is the cross section apart from width and thickness .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModi Xerox Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-31-1990
Reported in: (1990)LC230Tri(Delhi)
..... proforma credit therefore the contention that the central excise authorities have no jurisdiction to re classify and that they are bound by the classification made by the customs authorities is ..... words the second proviso does not empower the central excise authorities to re classify the goods already classified by the customs authorities therefore we reject the contention of shri asthana 13 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.T.P. Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-21-1990
Reported in: (1990)(29)ECC157
..... collector passed the order in original by which he has classified the various items under various headings 19 the appellants filed ..... with other coal tar distillation products these four products have been classified under ti 14 5 the ap pellants have submitted that ..... the appellants he submitted that jet set primer is also classifiable based on chemical examiner s report the items tarstil tarstil .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise Vs. Hico Products Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-29-1990
Reported in: (1990)(50)ELT381TriDel
..... have paid duty under protest claiming that these products are classifiable under tariff item 68 3 the department therefore drew samples ..... the respondents that the silicones having properties alone can be classified under tariff item 15a on the ground that explanation ii ..... surgical pink cloth not adhesive tape was considered and found classifiable under item 14e and not under item 60 collector of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWood Polymers Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-06-1990
Reported in: (1990)(47)ELT595TriDel
..... been filed against the order of the collector of central excise dated 31 7 1989 classifying the appellants products namely a decorative plastic laminated sheets paper based b cotton fabrics based ..... under chapter 48 which covers papers paper board and articles thereof etc collector appeals has classified the goods under heading 4811 39 as laminated paper whereas the assessee has claimed classification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise Vs. Nuchem Plastics Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-08-1990
Reported in: (1990)(29)ECC44
..... v general pharmaceutical pvt ltd pune following the technical meaning the product should not be classified under tariff item 15a 1 the assistant collector has held that technical and dictionary ..... this definition is applied then none of the modified condensation and polycondensation products can be classified under this tariff item further this tariff item covers condensation products whether or not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTop-o-plast Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-1990
Reported in: (1990)(30)LC109Tri(Delhi)
..... to take out licence for manufacture contending that the product was classifiable under t i 42 and dutiable thereupon the appellants addressed a ..... protest the appellant filed classification list for the product in question classifying it under t i 42 which was approved by the ..... at page 63 is the classification list submitted by the appellant classifying the product under t i 42 wherein also it is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. Maganlal and Co. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-28-1990
Reported in: (1990)(29)ECC76
..... co polyaddition products block copolymers and graft copolymers and polymer blends are to be classified in the heading covering polymers of that comonomer which predeminates by weight over every ..... predominant constituent gives the mixture its essential character the subject goods would therefore be classifiable under sub heading 3901 10 17 the appellants have declared the goods on the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTthermo Electrics Madras Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-1990
Reported in: (1991)(32)ECC68
..... which came up for hearing before special bench d consisting of 3 members the collector classified the product under tariff item 22f iv while the appellants claimed classification under tariff item ..... and educational institutions for heating solutions the collector has also held that it was not classifiable under item 33c cet as domestic electrical appliances as claimed by the appellants the appellants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhika Vitamalt Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-23-1990
Reported in: (1991)(54)ELT326TriDel
..... entitled to notification 168 69 for the goods which had been classified for cvd purposes under item 26b 1 of the central excise ..... included zinc ash and zinc dross hence there was no question of classifying such items as goods not elsewhere specified under item 68 cet ..... that zinc dust powder and zinc dross ash skimmings are properly classifiable under tariff item 26b and not under tariff item 68 the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial