Classifier - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: classifier Year: 1984 Page 1 of about 383 results (0.01 seconds)Glaxo Laboratories (India) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-03-1984
Reported in: 1984(3)ECC255; 1985(21)ELT72(Bom)
..... in respect of their revision application the petitioners submitted in the alternative that plasdone was classifiable as a drug under tariff item 28 the submissions of the petitioners were rejected ..... soluble resins deals with synthetic polymers the mcgraw hill encyclopaedia of science and technology also classifies synthetic polymers as synthetic resins 11 in the case of chemicals and fibres india .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamnord Research Laboratories Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-02-1984
Reported in: (1984)(15)ELT464TriDel
..... c e t the appellants contested that classification and contended that these goods should be classified under tariff entry no 37 01 08 photographic and cinematographic goods as per the contention ..... with perforations and for use in various types of processing machines and accordingly should be classified under chapter 37 photographic and cinematographic goods of the customs tariff act 1975 according to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFormica India Division Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-09-1984
Reported in: (1984)(17)ELT590TriDel
..... is of the opinion that impregnated paper impregnated fabrics and impregnated glass fabrics are correctly classifiable under tariff items 17 19 and 22 respectively 15 against the above background we may ..... generic description man made fibre it follows that textile fabrics made of glass are also classifiable under the generic description man made fabrics the description man made fabrics came into the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Central Excise Vs. Oswal Agro Mills Limited
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-20-1984
Reported in: (1985)LC651Tri(Delhi)
..... the ordinary dictionary meaning of the word household cannot be adopted as a criterion for classifying toilet soap under the heading household and laundry soap the dictionary meaning is a ..... observed that excise act was enacted to raise revenue for this purpose substances should be classified according to the general usage and known denominations of trade the principal concern of classification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEmpire Industries Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-05-1984
Reported in: (1985)(19)ELT572TriDel
..... appellant s product satisfies the definition of glass and glassware in the first schedule and classify it accordingly it is not without significance that vitrum means glass or glass like substance ..... significance and utility cannot obviously be considered as glassware when they can more appropriately be classified as hospital equipment f similarly the case reported in 1982 elt 237 bom can be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Customs Vs. Premier Tyres Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-1984
Reported in: (1985)(20)ELT124TriDel
..... more than 4 monomeric units which were graded according to their average molecular weights were classified as polycondensation polyaddition products under chapter 39 cta 1975 these were similar to resols and ..... technical manager was relied upon vii alternatively the product being a lubricating preparation could be classified under heading 34 01 07 2 10 the submissions of shri bagalkote on behalf of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtul Glass Industries (i) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-30-1984
Reported in: (1984)(17)ELT585TriDel
..... impugned order in appeal held that the following three products manufactured by the appellants were classifiable under item 23a 4 however in respect of glass mirrors the collector appeals held that ..... judgment of these three authorities if now the windscreens manufactured by the present appellants were classified under item 23a 4 they would stand heavily discriminated against and they would not be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Textile Paper Tube Company Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-25-1984
Reported in: (1984)(18)ELT35TriDel
..... the defence containers and vim containers the classification of which is under consideration were rightly classified under the residuary general excise item 68 till sub item 4 was introduced in item ..... the product in question besides this the principle of essential character of an article for classifying the same under customs tariff has no application in excise tariff classification in the excise .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNeo-pharma Private Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-20-1984
Reported in: (1989)(44)ELT328TriDel
..... on the basis of the therapeutic index of the product which the appellants were manufacturing classified this product under heading heparin mucous in extra pharmacopoeia according to the assistant collector ..... mucopolysaccharide cannot be separated from the imported hirudoid substance and therefore this product is appropriately classifiable under heading 30 01 and not heading 39 01 06 16 in view of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVital and Vital Oil Pvt. Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-1984
Reported in: (1985)(5)LC1601Tri(Delhi)
..... 5 1982 the appellants claimed that the three products would be classifiable under tariff item 12 only and the reliance of the ..... held adjudication and thereafter passed an order dated 27 6 1983 classifying these three commodities under tariff item 68 the appeal against ..... consumption but only a decision whether the edible vegetable product was classifiable as an oil for the limited purposes of that act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial