Classifier - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: classifier Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 364 results (0.008 seconds)Aluminium Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-29-1986
Reported in: (1987)(30)ELT442TriDel
..... earlier decision and held that galvanised and ungalvanised steel wires were classifiable under tariff item 68 of the central excise tariff aggrieved ..... different from the solid single wires the same should be classified under tariff item 68 with effect from 1 3 1975 ..... or not coated but insulated electric resistence wire has been classified separately there is no item as stranded wires in contrast .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGonterman Peipers (India) Limited Vs. Additional Secretary to the Gove ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-05-1986
Reported in: 1987(13)ECC33,1991LC286(Calcutta),1986(26)ELT471(Cal)
..... castings continued to remain are machined and could not therefore be classified under tariff item 68 on examination of the case records the ..... certain manufacturing processes has emerged as a new and different product classifiable under tariff item no 68 as all other goods not ..... and the revenue board are all agreed that it cannot be classified as a rayon fabric and therefore this court should not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIndian Aluminium Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Collector of Customs and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-10-1986
Reported in: 1986(8)ECC167,1986(25)ELT666(Cal)
..... appellate tribunal by its impugned order dated april 27 1983 having classified the subject machine the hot blocker imported by the petitioner no ..... the purpose of payment of customs duty it should have been classified according to the petitioners under heading no 84 22 of the ..... unloading machine its sole function being coiling it could not be classified under item no 84 22 as suggested on behalf of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCollector of Customs Vs. Warner Hindustan Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-1986
Reported in: (1986)(9)ECC108
..... may contain alloy constituents other than carbon they are generally classified as carbon steel alloy steel corrosion and heat resisting steels ..... other cast alloys incoloy 800 on the contrary is actually classified as nickel alloy and not as stainless steel reliance on ..... classification of the goods the goods in question are actually classified as nickel alloys and not stainless steel alloys i the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHicks thermometers (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-30-1986
Reported in: (1986)(10)ECC299
..... capillary glass tubing and bulb glass tubing under the central excise tariff the department has classified them under item 23a 4 of the central excise tariff whereas appellants are seeking ..... is manufactured by manufacturers of laboratory glassware it does not follow that capillary tubing should classify as laboratory glassware 20 we have carefully considered the case law cited by the appellants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPaisa Fund Glass Works Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-14-1986
Reported in: (1989)(44)ELT683TriDel
..... to the concerned range supdt the superintendent held that the said lenses were correctly classifiable under tariff item 68 of the central excise tariff accordingly he accorded approval to ..... are optically worked unmounted optical elements including contact lenses made of artificial plastic materials are classified in heading 90 01 whether or not they are optically worked collector of central .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAccurate Engineering Co. and ors. Vs. Collector of Central Excise and
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-14-1986
Reported in: (1986)(8)ECC1
..... that the caged roller assemblies independently cannot work as bearing and therefore they cannot be classified as the complete bearing xii the catalogue of durkoppwerke gmbh bible feld germany ex 4 ..... rollers alone even without cages are used for antifriction purposes it would be necessary to classify these needle rollers themselves as bearings and this would be contrary to even accepted notions .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBinny Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-10-1986
Reported in: (1986)LC440Tri(Delhi)
..... for stretching lengthwise the question was whether such strapping was classifiable as a rayon fabric under item 22 of the central ..... in the process of manufacture in paper manufacturing units would be classifiable as textile 27 undeniably the other decisions cited by the ..... of what is called users test stating that tarpaulin cannot be classified as cotton fabrics since tarpaulins cannot be put to use .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKores India Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-03-1986
Reported in: (1986)(10)ECC248
..... excise tariff thereafter the appellants were asked to file classification lists for the stencil paper classifying it under tariff item 17 2 with effect from 16th march 1976 and to ..... central excise according to which stencil paper duplicating stencils according to the superintendent was correctly classifiable under item 68 and stencil skin stencil paper according to the superintendent was leviable to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBirla Jute Mfg. Company Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-30-1986
Reported in: (1987)(11)ECC227
..... and jute with the latter predominating in weight would be correctly classifiable under tariff item 22 a as jute manufactures and not as ..... and a separate notifiction was issued for exempting the hard waste classifiable under item 18 e it was held that till the exemption ..... tariff entry even after the product enjoying the benefit thereof becomes classifiable under a new tariff entry as a result of an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial