Classifier - Judgment Search Results

Union of India Vs. Bharat Carpets Limited

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1981(8)ELT57(Del)

..... much as they were not woven and were not a fabric and was thereforee not classifiable under the same it was also pleaded that section 40 of the central excises and .....

State of Gujarat and anr. Vs. Lalsingh Kishansingh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1981SC368; 1980CriLJ1413; (1981)0GLR450; (1981)2SCC75; [1981]1SCR391

..... activities in coastal zones which is known as coastal regulation zone notification the said notification classifies the area within 500 meters of high tide land into crz i crz ii crz .....

Kalyani (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. Narayanan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1980SC1173; 1980Supp(1)SCC298; [1980]2SCR1130

..... 1 includes both registered and unregistered dealers and it cannot be contended that dealers are classified into registered and unregistered dealers the former coming under s 11 4 a and the .....

Snepp Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... court thought that snepp s fiduciary obligation extended only to preserving the confidentiality of classified material it therefore limited recovery to nominal damages and to the possibility of ..... powerless to prevent its agents from publishing any information they chose to publish whether classified or not the government theorized that this appearance of weakness would discourage foreign governments .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-iii Vs. Smt. T.P. Sidhwa

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1981)22CTR(Bom)146; [1982]133ITR840(Bom); [1981]6TAXMAN91(Bom)

..... the rental income from stalls received by the company should be classified as business income under the specific head profits and gains from ..... would be treated as income from property once the income is classified under a particular head then naturally one has to look to ..... income of the assessee in the present case having once been classified under the head income from property there is not question of .....

Andrus Vs. Utah

Court: US Supreme Court

..... indemnity selections held section 7 confers on the secretary the authority in his discretion to classify lands within a federal grazing district as proper for school indemnity selection his grossly disparate ..... shall not be subject to disposition settlement or occupation until after the same have been classified and opened to entry provided that locations and entries under the mining laws including .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Bombay City-ii Vs. D.G. Goenka

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1981]129ITR260(Bom)

..... the assessee the assessment orders were rectified by the ito and the dividend incomes were classified as earned income 3 the commissioner of income tax bombay exercised his revisional jurisdiction under ..... assessee which is chargeable under the head income from other sources can qualify for being classified as earned income only if it is immediately derived from personal exertion earned income .....

Sahney Kirkwood Private Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1991(34)LC406(Bombay)

..... products they are manufactured by feeding natural mica through automatic sorters and classifiers laid through continuous laying machines with different types of binding materials this ..... by feeding related composition and natural mica through automaticsimilar physical properties sorters and classifiers laid throughmicas are mined they are continuous laying machines wherecomplex silicates of .....

Khardah Company Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1983(14)ELT2159(Cal)

..... w tarpaulin has been examined and it has been decided to classify the said products as all other descriptions of jute manufactures ..... barred in showing cause the petitioner pointed out that they originally classified their products as falling within the category specified in entry ..... with law and on the other hand they themselves having classified their products as those coming under entry 22a 1 in .....

Ajay Cottons Limited Vs. C. Venkatraman, Chief Controller of Imports a ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1990(29)LC489(Bombay)

..... classification the company had proposed that the item should be classified or re classified as falling under the entry bb 1 for cash assistance ..... exported did not appear to be absorbent cotton wool the committee classified the item as falling under bb 1 for cash assistance ..... in view of the fact that the classification committee had expressly classified the product as one falling under the entry bb 1 in .....