Classifier - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: classifier Year: 1971 Page 1 of about 157 results (0.012 seconds)Daisy and anr. Vs. the State of Kerala
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-20-1971
Reported in: AIR1971SC2272; (1972)4SCC243; 1971(III)LC531(SC)
..... act is to raise revenue for which various products are differently classified in new tariff act resort should in the circumstances be had ..... tooth power dant manjan lal manufactured by assessee has to be classified as a toiletry and not medicament by applying the common parlance ..... specifically covered by chapter sub heading 3306 it has to be classified there under by virtue of chapter note 1 d of chapter .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Wealth-tax, Gujarat Vs. S.C. Kothari
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-05-1971
Reported in: AIR1972SC391; [1971]82ITR794(SC); (1972)4SCC402; [1972]1SCR950
..... 1 includes both registered and unregistered dealers and it cannot be contended that dealers are classified into registered and unregistered dealers the former coming under s 11 4 a and the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.R. Shivadatta Vs. the Selection Committee to Govt. Medical College a ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Nov-24-1971
Reported in: AIR1972Kant135; AIR1972Mys135
..... instant case the reckoning of 40 tonnes of sugarcane per acre from the acquired land classified as class i one lands being bagayat lands by the reference court was in fact .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.G. Chandrashekar Vs. State of Mysore and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-21-1971
Reported in: [1973]87ITR187(KAR); [1973]87ITR187(Karn)
govinda bhat j 1 this is a revision petition by an assessee under section 55 of the mysore agricultural income...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMunicipal Board, Kannauj Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-12-1971
Reported in: AIR1971SC2147; (1972)3SCC345; [1972]1SCR193; 1971(III)LC784(SC)
..... classification made by the impugned act is rational and the differentia by which offenders are classified has a rational relation with the object of the act to provide for the speedy .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSita Saran Singh Vs. Kedar Prasad Singh and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-21-1971
Reported in: (1971)3SCC200; 1971(III)LC254(SC)
..... claimants had failed to prove that the land had any irrigation facility the reference judge classified the lands as jirayat lands held that the finding of fact arrived at by the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew York Times Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1971
..... footnote 4 6 also in precise language proscribes knowing and willful publication of any classified information concerning the cryptographic systems page 403 u s 736 or communication intelligence ..... for any person willfully to disclose without proper authorization for any purpose whatever information classified secret or top secret knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe such information to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcgee Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-17-1971
..... jeopardized the interest of the selective service system as the administrative agency responsible for classifying registrants in developing the facts and using its expertise to assess his claims to ..... the pending conscientious objector claim was reviewed footnote 10 and rejected and petitioner was classified i a petitioner contends that denial of conscientious objector status was erroneous but after .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK. Srinivasan Vs. the General Manager, Southern Railway and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-08-1971
Reported in: (1972)2MLJ1
..... of the railway board issued on 1st august 1951 which classified ministerial posts according to him his duties are purely clerical ..... railway board has treated superintendents office as ministerial servants and so classified them he would be entitled as of right to obtain ..... 1951 the board acting under rule 2046 2 purported to classify certain railway servants as ministerial staff whilst doing so the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.P. Hirematt and ors. Vs. State of Mysore and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jan-20-1971
Reported in: AIR1971Kant229; AIR1971Mys229
..... and that confers a right on the selected candidates to get appointed to those classified vacancies the rule making authority has made a valid classification of direct recruits and ..... will be arbitrarilydenied of their statutory right to retain theirpositions and probably get confirmed inthose classified vacancies as per the quotareserved under the recruitment rules inour opinion the validity of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial