Classifier - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: classifier Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 557 results (0.017 seconds)A.B. Mauri India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-19-2010
..... rate of duty which was rejected by the adjudicating authority which classified the goods as noted above 2 before us the whole ..... oil fat based cake improvers were held to be bakery shortenings classifiable under heading 15 08 and certain flour based bread improvers ..... revenue is able to adduce adequate evidence in support of classifying the appellant s products under heading 21 08 the classification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFdc Ltd and Another Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and Another
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-22-2010
..... cosmetics act rules the goods in question are liable to be classified as medicaments on account of the presence therein of active ..... manufactured by the assessee during the material period and we classify the product accordingly 10 learned consultant has referred to the ..... the revenue also will stand partly allowed with vitcofol drops classified under sh 2936 00 and the classification of the other .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTXerox India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-22-2010
..... authorities under the act and the tribunal is that the aforesaid machines require to be classified under chapter heading 8479 89 residual heading 4 before examining this question the relevant ..... and incorporating or working in conjunction with an automatic data processing machine are to be classified in the headings appropriate to their respective functions or failing that in residual headings 10 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Azam Foods Products Pvt. Ltd., Having Its Office and Unit at Goll ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-06-2010
..... dated 13 01 2005 that as the petitioner s account is classified as npa no operations therein are permissible including release of the ..... non performing asset means an asset or account of a borrower classified by secured creditor as sub standard doubtful or loss asset ..... thereof and the account in respect of such debt could be classified by the secured creditor as npa in accordance with any operational .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs C.G.O. Vs. Sonam International Shop No.9
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-07-2010
..... whether the subject goods have been misdeclared under chapter heading 2936 and should have been classified under chapter heading 2309 3 whether the goods having nor gone through any manufacturing ..... to animal feeding preparation consisting of one or more vitamins and nutrients mixed with diluent classified under heading 2302 of ceta 1985 the tribunal upheld the classification as animal feed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAzam Foods Products Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by Its Managing Director, Mr. Mohd ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jun-07-2010
..... dated 13 01 2005 that as the petitioner s account is classified as npa no operations therein are permissible including release of the ..... non performing asset means an asset or account of a borrower classified by secured creditor as sub standard doubtful or loss asset ..... thereof and the account in respect of such debt could be classified by the secured creditor as npa in accordance with any operational .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs Himani Limited (Now Known as Emami Limited) Vs. the Commissioner of ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-25-2010
..... evidence whatsoever to establish that the aforesaid products are of cosmetic nature and cannot be classified as medicaments none of the affidavits or the other evidence adduced by the assessee dealers ..... taxation accordingly the tribunal and the other subordinate taxing authorities committed a gross error in classifying them as cosmetics and in levying tax accordingly 5 there are some revisions of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEversmile Pre-fab Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise Thane-i ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-18-2010
..... or standard of the product were not to be used for classifying the product under the tariff schedule in this connection he ..... april 1998 the assessee in their declarations filed under rule 173b classified their products under sub heading 6807 20 as blocks slabs ..... irrelevant to this case it appears from the records that the classifiability of the cement concrete blocks in question under heading 68 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S.Sohams Foundation Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cusoms ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai
Decided on: Apr-19-2010
..... 59 we have to see where the goods are to be classified the general rules for interpretation require to be applied as ..... 2 b or for any other reason goods are prima facie classifiable under two or more headings classification shall be effected as ..... the shape of a regular polygon the goods are more appropriately classifiable under the residuary heading 39269080 covering articles of polypropylene which is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMirc Electronics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Acc), Mumbai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-23-2010
..... and incorporating or working in conjunction with an automatic data processing machine are to be classified in the headings appropriate to their respective functions or failing that in residual headings the ..... which was imported admittedly for the purpose of editing of cinematographic films etc could be classified as an electrical machine apparatus under the residual sub heading 8543 89 under heading .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial