Classifier - Judgment Search Results

Rane Brake Linings Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2007)(118)ECC222

..... samples opined that the product in question be considered as a plastic material phenol formaldehyde classifiable under tariff item no 15a 1 i as phenoplast considering the chief chemist s findings ..... resulting from chemical processes 10 it was submitted by learned consultant that friction dust was classified by the commissioner with reference to how it appeared at an earlier intermediate stage we .....

Kanishk Steel Industries Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2007)(123)ECC332

..... and steel they felt that it would be more appropriately classifiable under heading 26 19 of the tariff schedule irrespective of ..... view in adjudication the joint commissioner of customs adjudicating authority classified the goods under heading 26 19 by relying on the ..... of such composition could by no stretch of imagination be classified as slag dross scalings or other waste from the manufacture .....

Parents Involved in Community Schools Vs. Seattle School Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which has never operated legally segregated schools or been subject to court ordered desegregation classified children as white or nonwhite and used the racial classifications as a tiebreaker to ..... authority to collaborate with principals and staff to maintain schools within the desired range classifying and assigning schoolchildren according to a binary conception of race is an extreme approach .....

Bengal Waterproof Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2007)(122)ECC285

..... no 6201 00 without testing the rainwear whether made out of vulcanised rubber holding rainwear classifiable under the chapter heading no 4015 00 was totally misconceived and devoid of merit ..... undisputed position in relation to raw material used for making rainwear was rubberised textile fabric classifying rainwear under sub heading 4015 00 is inconceivable for the reason that the goods covered .....

Khyali Ram, Ex-inspector S/O Shri Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Throu ...

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in: (2008)(2)SLJ379CAT

..... and interest of country had been obtaining collecting and communicating to some foreign agents classified documents information which were directly or indirectly useful to enemy which might effect ..... country or that the applicant was obtaining collecting and communicating to some foreign agents classified documents information which could be directly or indirectly useful to enemy which might .....

Health India Laboratories Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2007)(116)ECC392

..... or assessee against the order of the commissioner of central excise chennai iv commissionerate classifying the product indian noni manufactured by the assessee as a food preparation not elsewhere ..... literature and label on the product the adjudicating authority decided that indian noni was classifiable as fruit preparation not elsewhere specified or included in the residuary chapter heading 2106 .....

Karnataka Agro Chemicals and ors. Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2007)(120)ECC25

..... 1989 in fact in 1994 proceedings were initiated in respect of karnataka agro chemicals to classify the impugned goods as plant growth regulators but the assistant commissioner held that the micronutrient ..... products are mixtures of various inorganic substances therefore we do not find adequate grounds for classifying the impugned products under chapter 5 1 the classification of micro nutrients is a .....

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Vicco Laboratories

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(3)ALLMR(SC)453; 2008(2)CTC511; 2007(123)ECC278; 2007(149)LC278(SC); 2007(218)ELT647(SC); (2008)4MLJ1272(SC); 2007(3)SCALE481

..... manjan lal is a toilet preparation and not a medicinal preparation ayurvedic and therefore not classifiable as a medicine ayurvedic and accordingly not eligible for the benefit of exemption notification the ..... been taken place these products appear to be tooth powder tooth paste and vanishing cream classifiable under heading 3306 00 and 3304 00 respectively andwhereas vicco turmeric cream has mainly .....

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2007)(121)ECC202

..... description according to him the lower appellate authority has rightly classified the goods under heading 90 27 in preference to 90 ..... the revenue appellant would like to have the subject goods classified under this last sub heading inasmuch as the item is ..... other than tomographic dental medical surgical and veterinary it should be classified under the residual sub heading 9022 19 as claimed by .....

Modern Malleable Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2008)(125)ECC274

..... being according to isi specification and meant for power transmission lines those cannot be erroneously classified under chapter 73 of central excise tariff act 1985 the appellant should be given ..... classification for towers which is under a mechanical heading should be justified they cannot be classified under electrical heading since they are not in electrical contact or carry any electricity .....