Skip to content


Classifier - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: classifier Year: 1996 Page 1 of about 809 results (0.012 seconds)
Mar 12 1996 (TRI)

Chemical Process Equipments Pvt. Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Mar-12-1996

Reported in: (2004)(163)ELT457TriDel

..... and another classification list effective from 1 4 87 in this classification list the appellants classified pipes and fittings such as elbows tees reducers stubend flanges ducting fittings such as ..... 3926 90 9 the learned counsel submitted that the appellants submitted a fresh classification list classifying pipes and fittings such as elbows tees reducers stubends flanges ducting fittings such as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 12 1996 (TRI)

Shree Arun Packaging Corporation Vs. Collector of C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-12-1996

Reported in: (1996)(88)ELT417TriDel

..... the appellants contended that these articles being not labels or wall paper they are rightly classifiable as other products of printing industry under sub heading no 4901 90 about printed wrappers ..... the asstt collector after considering the various submissions held that printed covers are containers and classifiable under sub heading 4818 19 he also held that printed display hanging card printed top .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 1996 (TRI)

inarco Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-06-1996

Reported in: (1997)(90)ELT104TriDel

..... textile machinery and the items in question were admittedly parts of textile machinery they were classifiable under the later heading 28 i therefore accept the department s contentions and reject the ..... tariff the supreme court was not dealing with the question whether such pipe fitting were classifiable under a more specific tariff description than pipes and tubes hence the classification of cots .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 1996 (TRI)

Kamal Auto Industries Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-29-1996

Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT558TriDel

..... find that the short issue is whether bodies built on chassis or motor vehicles are classifiable under chapter heading 8707 or under chapter headings 8702 to 8705 and also whether introduction ..... chapter note does not cover the bodies built on chassis fitted with engine which is classifiable under chapter heading 8706 therefore the classification of bodies built by independent manufacturers on chassis .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 29 1996 (TRI)

Electrotherm (i) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-29-1996

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT318TriDel

..... capacitor bank from spain at the original stage the assistant collector classified the goods under heading 85 43 1 3 it was his ..... different voltage it was also their contention that it was not classifiable under 85 43 because the explanatory notes under this heading ..... it could be invoked only if the item was not found classifiable in other entry of this chapter and had individual functions industrial .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 1996 (TRI)

Amritlal Chemaux Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-25-1996

Reported in: (1997)(89)ELT108TriDel

..... dilution and that after comparing the competing entries the product is a finishing agent correctly classifiable under sub heading no 3801 90 on the question of classification of kem kerrier tci ..... two completing entries the product described as azofast is a finishing agent and was correctly classifiable under sub heading 3801 90 no additional evidence was brought on record nor any additional .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 06 1996 (TRI)

Crompton Greaves Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-06-1996

Reported in: (1996)(87)ELT414TriDel

..... however held the porcelain clad vaccum circuit breakers and ehv sf6 gas circuit breakers were classifiable under sub heading 8533 00 the respondent filed application under section 35e iv of central ..... difficult to see how the impugned goods which admittedly are panels equipped with circuit breaker classifiable under tariff heading 8535 00 and equipped with also fuses over current relays earth fault .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 23 1996 (TRI)

Amar Products Vs. Additional Collector of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-23-1996

Reported in: (1997)(89)ELT500TriDel

..... heading lies on the department which the department has not discharged that their product was classifiable under chapter sub heading 2106 90 which attracted nil rate of duty and therefore the ..... 11 regarding classification of the subject goods namely flavoured pan masala the ld collector has classified the flavoured pan masala under heading 2107 91 rejecting the claim of the appellants for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 1996 (TRI)

Grasim Industries Limited Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-05-1996

Reported in: (1997)(92)ELT607TriDel

..... commodity description appearing on page 1184 wherein it is mentioned that filtering elements are classified according to the constituent material and ingnoring the fundamental point that in the case ..... explanatory notes to harmonised commodity description and coding system p 1184 filtering elements are classified according to their constituent material the subject goods are wire mesh made of stainless .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 26 1996 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Anup Engg. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-26-1996

Reported in: (1997)(89)ELT690TriDel

..... customers the asstt collector of central excise in separate orders had classified the product under item no 68 of the old central excise ..... a specific part and had assumed definite shape and were correctly classifiable under item no 68 of the tariff as goods not ..... steel in crude form intermediate products and the finished products were classifiable under different tariff entries w e f 1 8 1983 all .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //