Skip to content


Classifier - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: classifier Year: 1989 Page 1 of about 381 results (0.01 seconds)
Apr 18 1989 (FN)

American Foreign Svc. Ass'n Vs. Garfinkel

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-18-1989

..... appellee director of central intelligence dci forbade certain executive branch employees to reveal classified or classifiable information to persons not authorized to receive such information making clear that ..... intelligence dci now appellee webster both of these forms forbade employees to reveal classified or classifiable information to persons not authorized to receive such information app 15 19 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 29 1989 (TRI)

Meghdoot Laminart Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-29-1989

Reported in: (1990)(26)ECC62

..... the appellant was concerned it was a process of polymerisation and it should have been classified under chapter 39 and other constituent materials could not decide classification he contended that reliance ..... manufacturing identical product appellant filed classification list no 2 86 87 dated 2 4 1986 classifying their product under sub heading 3920 31 which was approved appellant was also availing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 11 1989 (TRI)

Collector of Customs Vs. Sun Export Corporation

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-11-1989

Reported in: (1989)(22)ECC329

..... 01 45 of the customs tariff the imported vitamins were correctly classifiable under heading 29 01 45 17 of the customs tariff since ..... the collector of customs appeals calcutta s orders were right in classifying the goods in question as falling under 29 01 45 17 ..... which are used for supplementing cattle and poultry feed should be classified as cattle feed within the meaning of entry 21 of schedule .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 14 1989 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Fenner (India) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Sep-14-1989

Reported in: (1989)(24)ECC115

..... colliery conveyer belting and pvc inpregnated cotton conveyor belting food quality the above products were classified under tariff sub heading 3922 90 under the central excise tariff act 1985 vide ..... in the matter of classification shri lakshmikumaran has further argued that this conveyor beltings were classifiable under tariff item 68 of the erstwhile central excise tariff the identity of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 17 1989 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. G. Claridge and Co. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-17-1989

Reported in: (1990)(25)ECC101

..... hence they cannot come within the sub classification below containers accordingly these products are not classifiable under sub classification 4818 19 of the central excise tariff act 1985 the learned counsel ..... 4 5 1984 and he also decided that the products of the respondents were correctly classifiable under tariff item 68 of the cet the respondents contention that the approved classification was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 1989 (TRI)

Hico Products Limited Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-1989

Reported in: (1990)(29)ECC280

..... form therefore according to him these silicone emulsions are not classifiable under tariff item 15a 1 but would fall under item ..... dispersions and solutions thus silicone oils in emulsion form are classifiable under item 15a 1 by virtue of explanations ii and ..... consultant in support of his argument that their products should be classified under tariff item 15aa as organic surface active agents dealt .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 1989 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex Vs. Metrowood Engineering Works

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Feb-16-1989

Reported in: (1989)(24)ECC176

..... heading 8546 00 chargeable to duty 15 ad valorem the assistant collector of central excise classified the industrial laminates electrical insulators under heading 3920 31 chargeable to duty 35 ad valorem ..... at page 1406 he has therefore argued that the respondent s industrial laminates are correctly classifiable under heading 8546 which covers electrical insulators of any material he has relied on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 1989 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Perfect Electric Corporation (P)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-27-1989

Reported in: (1989)(43)ELT653TriDel

..... the introduction of item 61 the goods manufactured as above by the respondents became classifiable to duty under item 61 cet the respondents however filed classification list claiming classification ..... involved in this case are switches and cannot be described as electric lighting fittings classifiable under tariff item 61 cet because these are specially manufactured according to the automobile .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 1989 (TRI)

Precious Industries Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-30-1989

Reported in: (1989)(24)ECC297

..... composite insulation materials made up of plastic portion and papers were classifiable under heading 39 01 06 of the customs tariff act ..... reproduced below 3 when for any reason goods are prima facie classifiable under two or more headings classification shall be effected as ..... not falling within any heading of the schedule shall be classified under the heading appropriate to the goods to which they .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 15 1989 (TRI)

Mitutronics Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-15-1989

Reported in: (1990)(25)ECC232

..... 8524 90 the assistant collector by order dated 1st june 1988 classified them under heading 8524 21 as recorded media magnetic tape ..... product like card affixed inseparably with magnitude tape should not be classified under 8524 21 this is evident because this sub heading ..... alia covers all recorded phenomenon 13 the collector appeals has classified the goods under sub heading 8524 90 for the reason .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //