Skip to content


Latest Cases Home > Latest Page 6 of about 764,019 results (1.464 seconds)

Sep 20 2024 (SC)

Bhagwan Singh Vs. State Of U.p.

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE2024INSC708IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL Nos..OF2024(@ SLP(CRL.)NOs..OF2024@ DIARY No.18885 OF2024 BHAGWAN SINGH APPELLANT(S) VERSUS STATE OF U.P. & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT BELA M. TRIVEDI, J.1. Delay condoned.2. Leave granted. PREFACE3 While the finest of the legal minds and legal eagles on the Bench and in the Bar of the Supreme Court are busy developing the best of the jurisprudence and laying down the best of the laws for the country, there are certain sinister cabal of unscrupulous litigants and a coterie of their counsellors, who are always busy in taking undue advantage of the systemic lacunae and in misusing the process of law, in turn damaging 1 the image of the Courts as also of the entire legal fraternity/legal profession. The huge quantum of work load in the Courts, limitations of the human agencies in manning the Justice Delivery System and the fertile minds of the unscrupulous litigants and their legal counsell...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2024 (SC)

M/s Ultra Tech Cement Limited Vs. Mast Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE2024INSC709IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10662 of 2024 (Arising out of the Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.14286 of 2022) M/s. ULTRA-TECH CEMENT LTD. APPELLANT VERSUS MAST RAM & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT J.B. PARDIWALA, J.: For the convenience of exposition, this judgment is divided into the following parts: - INDEX I. FACTUAL MATRIX 3 II. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT ...8 III. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT NOS. 1-6 .12 IV. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT No.10 13 V. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENT No.11 ..15 VI. ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION .17 VII. ANALYSIS .18 A. Scheme of Arrangement between the Appellant and JAL under Sections 391 to 394 respectively of the Companies Act, 1956 18 B. Return of acquired land under the 2013 Act ..25 C. Impugned Order of the High Court ....28 D. Role of the State under Article 300-A of the Constitution ...30 VIII. CONCLUSION ..37 2 1. Leave Granted.2. This appeal ...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2024 (SC)

Opg Power Generation Private Limited Vs. Enexio Power Cooling Solution ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE2024INSC711IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3981-3982 OF2024(Arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos.21017-21018 of 2021) OPG POWER GENERATION PRIVATE LIMITED APPELLANT(S) Versus ENEXIO POWER COOLING SOLUTIONS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. RESPONDENT(S) With CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3983-3984 OF2024(Arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos.21009-21010 of 2021) JUDGMENT MANOJ MISRA, J.1. These two appeals are directed against a common judgment and order of the High Court1 dated 1 September 2021 passed in OSA (CAD) Nos. 174-175 of 2021, whereby, exercising powers under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19962 read with Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act, 20153 and Clause 15 of Amended Letters Patent, 1865 read with Order XXXVI1High Court of Judicature at Madras 2 1996 Act 3 2015 Act Civil Appeal @ SLP (C) Nos.21017-21018 of 2021 Page 1 of 150 Rule 9 of O.S. Rules, the Division Bench of the High Court allowed the appeals, set aside the...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2024 (HC)

Sri Suresha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:38865 CRL.P No.5694 of 2024 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE20H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5694 OF2024BETWEEN:1. . SRI SURESHA AGED ABOUT35YEARS S/O VISHWANATHA POOJARY RESIDING AT HOUSE NO.3/39 MAJISITE MANE, POST: BOLIYAR MANGALURU, D.K. DISTRICT 574 153. 2 . SRI VINAYA KUMAR M., S/O SHANKARA NAYAK, AGED ABOUT38YEARS, RESIDING AT No.3-101, MAGANDADI HOUSE, BOLIYAR, MANGALURU, D.K. DISTRICT 574 153. 3 . SRI SUBHAS, S/O GOPALA PUJARI, AGED ABOUT41YEARS, RESIDING AT263/1, BORUGADDE HOUSE, MANGALURU TALUK, BOLIYAR, MANGALURU, D.K. DISTRICT 574 153. 4 . SRI RANJAN @ RANJITH S/O RAMAPPA POOJARY, AGED ABOUT36YEARS, RESIDING AT No.1-102, ODANA KATTE, BOLIYAR, MANGALURU, D.K. DISTRICT 574 153.-. 2 - NC:2024. KHC:38865 CRL.P No.5694 of 2024 5 . SRI DHANANJAYA, S/O BABU POOJARY, AGED ABOUT39YEARS, RESIDING AT No.1-14-3(1), KUMMOTU, BOLIYAR, MANGALURU, D.K. DISTRICT 574 153. ... PETI...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (SC)

Kamal Kishor Sehgal(d) Thr.lrs. Vs. Murti Devi (dead) Thr. Lrs.

Court : Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE2024INSC707IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.9482 OF2013KAMAL KISHORE SEHGAL (D) THR. LRS. & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MURTI DEVI (DEAD) THR. LRS. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT PANKAJ MITHAL, J.1. The suit of the plaintiff now represented by her heirs and legal representatives (respondents herein) for the decree of permanent injunction in respect of the use of passage, more commonly described as common passage, was dismissed by the court of first instance, but in appeal the judgment and order of the Trial Court has been reversed and the suit stands decreed.2. In the above circumstances, the defendants and their legal representatives (appellants herein) have preferred this appeal. 13. We have heard Mr. S. K. Sharma, advocate for the appellants and Mr. Gaurav Agrawal, Sr. Advocate for the respondents.4. The pleadings of the parties reveal that Sh. Jaspal Singh along with Smt. Raj Rani and Smt. Sudesh Rani jointly purchased a piece of land me...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (SC)

Secretary, Public Works Department . Vs. Tukaram Pandurang Saraf .

Court : Supreme Court of India

2024 INSC703NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 1689 OF2016THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT & ORS. .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS TUKARAM PANDURANG SARAF & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.1. Heard.2. The present appeal by special leave is preferred on behalf of the appellants-employer, challenging the impugned judgment dated 15th November, 2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench at Nagpur in Writ Petition No.3425 of 2010 (Civil), whereby the High Court dismissed the said writ petition filed by appellants-employer and upheld the judgment and order dated 31st October, 2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal, 1 Maharashtra (hereinafter being referred to as Industrial Court) in Complaint (A.K.P.) No.38/2006. The Industrial Court had allowed the complaint filed by the respondent-employees upholding their claim for entitlement of holidays on 2nd and 4th Saturdays and for payment of salary equal to o...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (SC)

Sushma Vs. Nitin Ganapati Rangole

Court : Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE2024INSC706IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10648 OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 21172 of 2021) SUSHMA .APPELLANT(S) VERSUS NITIN GANAPATI RANGOLE & ORS. .RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10649 OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 1023 of 2022) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10650 OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 21248 of 2021) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10651 OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 337 of 2022) CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10652-10653 OF2024(Arising out of SLP(Civil) No(s). 17692-17693 of 2023) JUDGMENT Mehta, J.Civil Appeals @ SLP(Civil) Nos. 21172 of 2021 Civil Appeals @ SLP(Civil) Nos. 1023 of 2022 Civil Appeals @ SLP(Civil) Nos. 21248 of 2021 Civil Appeals @ SLP(Civil) Nos. 337 of 2022 1. Leave granted. 12. The appellant-claimants have preferred these appeals being aggrieved by the common judgment dated 7th April, 2021 passed by the Division Bench of High Court of Karnataka in MAC appeals1 filed by the appellan...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

U B Shetty Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.SOMASHEKAR AND THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.359 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.360 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.361 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.362 OF2022CONNECTED WITH COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.363 OF2022IN COMAP NO.359/2022 BETWEEN: U B SHETTY S/O MADAYYA SHETTY AGED ABOUT59YEARS CLASS-I CONTRACTOR R/AT WINDCHIME APARTMENTS NO.497, 6TH MAIN, RMV2D STAGE DOLLARS COLONY BENGALURU 560007. APPELLANT (BY SRI. YASHODHAR HEGDE - ADVOCATE) AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND2FAMILY WELFARE III-FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA BENGALURU 560 001. 2 . KARNATAKA HEALTH SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT REPRESENTED BY ITS PROJECT ADMINISTRATOR NOW RENAMED AS HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE SERVICES REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR6H FLOOR, AROGYA SOUDHA MAGADI ROAD BENGALURU 560 ...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Miss. Tanmai Aravind Nirna, Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Scie ...

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:38514 WP No.8912 of 2024 R C/W WP No.1916 of 2024 WP No.8989 of 2024 AND17OTHER PETITIONS IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.8912 OF2024(EDN-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.1916 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.8989 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9017 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9029 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9094 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9228 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9333 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9357 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9412 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9459 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9462 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9716 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9718 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9722 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9975 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.10509 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.11801 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.11844 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.14344 OF202...

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 19 2024 (HC)

Mr Bhuvan K R Vs. Rajiv Gandhi University Of Health Sciences

Court : Karnataka

- 1 - NC:2024. KHC:38514 WP No.8912 of 2024 R C/W WP No.1916 of 2024 WP No.8989 of 2024 AND17OTHER PETITIONS IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE19H DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION No.8912 OF2024(EDN-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.1916 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.8989 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9017 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9029 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9094 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9228 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9333 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9357 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9412 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9459 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9462 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9716 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9718 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9722 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.9975 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.10509 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.11801 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.11844 OF2024(EDN-RES) WRIT PETITION No.14344 OF202...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //